Anon is wrong, the Star Trek crew is just a consortium of more or less autistic people that get told what to do because they like being told what to wear, eat, do etc.
I like how none of the points are correct.
At best they could be a critique of the lives of the people that voluntarily join up to starfleet. Really the only thing that rings true is that, like any military, they have uniforms and you have to follow the orders of the chain of command.
They show tons of citizens of the federation doing whatever the fuck they want. Doing weird science experiments, going to conferences, settling planets, running a vineyard in France, Captain Siskos dad just has a restaurant for the fun of it.
Yeah this feels like a critique from someone who’s never watched Star Trek.
The bit about the food is pretty funny. Like sure, a few times people have mentioned liking some non-replicated food better, but in general it seems like it’s about as good as the real thing and you can get ANYTHING you want anywhere you have a replicator without needing the skills of a chef.
Then there’s Voyager where the crew prefers to use their limited replicator rations rather than eat the slop Neelix makes lol. Actually, that’s something that never made sense to me: Why were they so limited on replicator usage? Doesn’t it just convert energy into matter from the reactor powerful enough to power a warp drive? In general I find it kind of silly when they turn off the lights and stuff to “conserve power” when there’s trouble. Like the lights are drawing any meaningful amount of power compared to warping the fabric of time and space.
I mean, converting energy into matte, when you could be using said energy to get home does seem a bit wasteful.
Replicating 1 gram of matter from energy takes 90 TJ, so replicating a sugarcube would be roughly the power of a 50 megaton nuclear bomb.
Yeah I guess. Although I guess the question is how much energy does warp drive use or how much energy does the engine output given some amount of dilithium or whatever? No real way to know since it’s sci-fi. As far as I know the only physics we have on this is that paper that showed you’d need negative energy to make warp happen. Which is obviously not super helpful for figuring out what it would be in the hypothetical world of Star Trek where they found some way to make it physically possible.
I just imagine that their energy production has to be absolutely insane for warp travel to not only be feasible, but a fairly common thing more akin to launching a boat than a NASA mission.
You bring up a good point however, its basically a generator, and it needs fuel. So even if its not much energy saved, saving any was crucial for them when they never knew where they could next get dylythium.
So even though leaving the lights on only costs a couple cents day, well if you’re traveling for 10 years, those couple bits of energy add up. Especially considering they did have a decent sized crew and children on top of it!
Not to mention that this was written in the 80s and 90s. Lighting was signficiantly more of the average person’s energy bill before LEDs so it made sense to the audience back then.
They were conserving energy because it was hard for them to find the crystals they need. That said the lights are bound to be nothing compared to converting energy to matter or maintaining a warp field.
Op is confusing The Federation with The Borg.
Or military vs civilian life.
Yup. And civilians absolutely live on military ships in Star Trek, though we don’t see them much because the show tends to focus on the military team members.
only on a starship, earth is mainly soul food restaurants and vineyards
Anon has been assimilated by the Borg.
deleted by creator
you don’t know if OP is stupid or trolling
It’s always safest to assume both.
And throw in ignorant as well, often willingly ignorant.
I thought there are other hints, like races are countries. (For example klingons are russians etc)
Political I thought the Borg are the real commies. (In a GOP nightmare version)
deleted by creator
Interesting, would fit, too.
I thought they are Russians because of the 1992 movie: the undiscovered country. Released close after the end of the cold war…
I feel like at different times either the Klingon or Romulans kind of stand in for the Soviets. Certainly TNG onward the Klingons shift in their representation and the Romulans stay as that analogue to a secretive geopolitical rival that they maintain an uneasy peace with.
Aren’t the Romulans the Russians? The Klingons always seem to just be doing random war things and were mostly just doing their own stuff, whereas the Romulans seem to have some kind of actually coherent strategy.
I never got “communist” from Star Trek. There seemed to be very limited top-down control outside the military, trade seemed to be an important backdrop, and automation largely replaced the necessity for people to fill any particular role. So what it seems like is a low-touch society where automation serves the needs of the common people, but operates within a capitalist framework. If it was communist, I think we’d see a lot more conflict between the various races, but they’re largely happy with the equilibrium they’ve struck (outside various periods of conflict).
I think if we were to explore the Star Trek universe, we’d see a lot of corporations and whatnot controlling significant portions of the interstellar economy. But since we largely follow military and diplomatic groups, we just don’t see what the rest of society looks like.
Is incentivates a word? I better check my dictionotomy.
