At first this article reads like your typical anti-piracy screed. It rants about how 10x more people watched GoT illegally (confusing them with lost sales) and ends with how downloading movies can get your credit card stolen.

The middle of the article however, destroys the author’s case.

Time Warner (owning company of HBO) CEO Alan Bewkes stated in 2013 how becoming the most illegally streamed show in history was “better than an Emmy” and that torrenting ultimately led to more paid subscriptions.

“We’ve been dealing with this for 20, 30 years—people sharing subs, running wires down the backs of apartment buildings. Our experience is that it leads to more paying subs. I think you’re right that Game of Thrones is the most pirated show in the world and that’s better than an Emmy.”

The CEO of Time Warner, who knows more about the finances of his own show than ForeverGeek writer Tom Llewellyn, championed piracy and said that it brought them more subscribers rather than nearly destroying the show as the article claims.

Needless to say, Tom forwent a rebuttal in favor of writing how you can get malware from downloading it…

Anti-Piracy Propaganda: 0 Truth: 1

  • Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    464
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good thing they were fast enough to destroy it with the shittiest last season ever.

    • JayPalm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      See, I think that was the plan all along, to totally own all the losers that pirated GoT, by totally spoiling the show for everyone.

      • Daisyifyoudo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You give Dumb & Dumber FAR too much credit.

        Nothing was calculated, other than how fast they could leave GoT for Star Wars. I’m still bitter, and at this rate, I most likely always will be.

        Fuck D&D

      • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let’s be real. HBO wanted to hold on to their cash cow for as long as possible, but D&D just shat all over the last season to get that sweet Star Wars cash.

        Nobody was on-board with anything in that last season except D&D, who just wanted to finish it off as fast as possible. Not even the actors.

        • –Phase–@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The hilarious thing is how their own bungling of the last season cost them the Star Wars gig. Maybe if they’d actually put in some effort instead of half assing it, they’d have gotten the job. But then again, the show was on a downward spiral since the end of Season 4, and Dumb and Dumber’s only talent was adapting the books really well (and even then, they still fudged details), so I suppose this was bound to happen.

          • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Dumb and Dumber’s only talent was adapting the books really well

            Honestly, I want more Hollywood writers who are good at adapting books, instead of hating the source material and doing a terrible job winging it.

            I can’t count the number of TV shows ruined by Hollywood writers usurping the universes from multi-million dollar and very successful source material, just to create their own shitty version themselves. In fact, it’s much easier to adapt source material, so I don’t even understand why they don’t do it out of pure laziness. If they could just drop their fucking egos for a bit, they could be as famous as D&D.

            • –Phase–@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Another recent example of a horrible adaptation of a massive franchise is what Paramount did to Halo with their show. I can’t understand why they keep hiring writers that actively hate the source material and are only interested in taking existing stories and mangling them into their own shitty “vision”. It’s like Hollywood either hates writers who have actual passion for the franchises they’re adapting, or they can’t find them, which can’t be the case since these are beloved universes with millions of fans, many of whom are bound to be writers eager to work on an adaptation. They always hire talentless hacks interested in nothing more than a paycheck and doing what they want, not what the fans want. It’s infuriating.

              • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Witcher, Foundation, The Stand, Y: The Last Man, Wheel of Time, recent Star Trek, Rings of Power, Legend of the Seeker… the list goes on and on. Sandman is only good because Neil Gaiman is keeping a tight leash on the series.

                And then they cancel the rest that were turning out good, like The Expanse.

                • Wollff@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Do you notice a pattern?

                  Every single one of those is either SF or Fantasy.

                  There are a lot of artsy lovers of literature out there who hate exactly those genres, and who have a burning passion to fix all the (perceived) flaws which (in their view) come baked into them.

                  As I see it, that’s a big part of the problem: For the last century “a writer” was always “the literary type”. There were some nerds who pretended to be writers. And those wrote pulp, SF, fantasy, and comics. Those were not real writers. You wouldn’t hire one of those, if you wanted to have a real, well crafted story. At least that has been a rather common prejudice for the last 100 years or so.

                  And now, all of a sudden (over the last 20 years), the most popular franchises, generating the most income, all turned into SF and Fantasy, while eating everything else in their path.

                  In that context, I don’t think the current situation is all that surprising. If you want to hire “a real writer”, there is a good chance that you will hit one who despises what writers were taught to despise for the last hundred years. In an unlucky twist for everyone involved, that also happens to be what they now have to write.

        • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Didn’t the actor who played Tyrion Lannister stand by the ending? I remember him being salty about criticisms of it. Though to be fair it must really suck to have your breakthrough role go up in flames like that. I wouldn’t want to admit it either. Now I can’t even remember the dude’s name. He was supposed to be a beacon of hope for dwarf actors who wanted serious roles, and the role became a joke.

          • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maybe that, yeah, but I also remember certain interviews of him being just as passively critical about the last season as Emile Clarke was at the time. As in, he couldn’t really say anything damaging (contractually), but you could tell by the reactions.

            As far as dwarf actors, he really did break out into serious roles in various movies, especially in spots where his dwarfism wasn’t a highlight. But, I think Hollywood just treated him as an exception, instead of changing the framing of how they cast actors, which is extremely disappointing.

      • Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        83
        ·
        1 year ago

        That they yhrew away all the rules they established before like traveling now took 0 hours and soon. All of this because the last book wasn’t written yet so they had to write some story themselves and failed misserably.

        • Bucket_of_Truth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          74
          ·
          1 year ago

          HBO told the show runners(D&D) they could take as long as they wanted to finish the series. D&D had just landed jobs at the helm of a new Star Wars trilogy so they were eager to wrap up Thrones and start raking in that Disney cash. They made the last season shorter than other seasons, it sucked and they ended up losing the Star Wars deal.

          • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Considering the star wars stuff that’s been coming out, if you told me they were responsible for it, i’d believe you

            • variants@possumpat.io
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Give Andor a try, thats the one show I really liked out of the stuff Ive seen so far, after that the only other show Ive been into is the Expanse(non star wars), after the first season

              • pinchcramp@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I can second the recommendation for Andor. Used to love Star Wars, lost all interest in it after the new trilogy (although rogue one was alright) and finally got around to watch Andor which I really loved.

            • Emu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Mando and Andor were awesome. what are you talking about? Only BOBF and that dumb Obi series sucked.

            • Varyag@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              1 year ago

              They lost the deal for it, after how badly received the end of GoT was. Then again, the new SW trilogy managed to be shit entirely without their help.

              • Ryantific_theory@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah, Disney rejected them to protect the trilogy, and then managed to completely destroy the trilogy between two and half directors, and both Disney and Lucasfilm constantly interfering with the screen writing. Episode 7 might have been derivative, but without Episode 8 kneecapping all of the plot setups, followed by Episode 9 kneecapping all of 8’s plot redirections, it would have at least been fun.

                I mean, being honest, the prequel trilogy was mostly not great. But it was fun enough that people still love it. The sequels are so disjointed that it’s just hard to enjoy. Proof that even with all the money in the world, anyone can still fuck up.

                • Varyag@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You said it all. Episode 8 ruined everything forever. I didn’t even bother trying to watch episode 9 after that, and been majorly checked out of anything SW since. The last good SW movie was Rogue One…

          • Stoler
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            As I understand it, they walked away from the Stars Wars deal to sign with Netflix to make another adaptation. One that I’m sad that they’ve hitched their names onto.

          • idle@158436977.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I do think that sums it up pretty well, and as other have said, the last season had a “I don’t want to do this anymore, lets wrap this up vibe” and to make matters worse, they completely abandoned so many plots that you thought had a point to them. To me it felt so obvious that during the fall of kings landing, Cersi should have flipped out and Jamie should have killed her. History repeating itself. Maybe that was just too predictable for them to actually do it, but all the character development up to that point was the perfect setup for it and they just dropped it altogether.

        • WookieMunster@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          1 year ago

          I remember people knew the ending due to leaks about a year ahead of time and claimed it was all BS since it was so ridiculous. We were all wrong

          • NightOwl@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I went from avoiding leaks to a few episodes in not caring and read the leaks and laughed. Then joined freefolk to laugh at the show as it aired, which made it a much less miserable affair than it would have been. A nice season long The Room roasting for the show.

            Watching it straight up would have been pure torture.

      • ScrivenerX@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        1 year ago

        A surprising amount went wrong.

        While there are a sea of complaints, the biggest for me was that all of the characters stopped having internal logic. Take Jamie, he had a character arc moving from a vain knight avoiding responsibility and having an incestuous relationship with his sister, to having depth, showing that he was wracked with guilt for breaking his oath to help people. Falling in love with a woman for her character and who she was. Being responsible and honorable again. Then the last season came around and he dropped all of his growth to be with his sister.

        It’s like D&D decided that there would be a cool scene of him dieing with Cersi and didn’t care how he got there.

        • NightOwl@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was hilarious to see Tyrion find them with a light dusting of bricks on top. Comedy.

      • RyanHx@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        The show reached a point where they’d surpassed where the books were in the narrative and things fell apart. The political intrigue, backstabbing, and subversive nature of the story was done away with in favour of forcing plot points through to get everything wrapped up, with no consideration made on why those characters would act in the way they did.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        You could build a museum of horrible decisions and fill it with the last two seasons of Game of Thrones. Whether you watched it or not, the show was a cultural touchstone, and the ending retroactively ruined everything that came before. Many shows have started well and ended poorly, but I’d argue that GoT was on pace to be an all-time top ten series, and there was absolutely nothing good to say about how it ended. Bad writing, bad acting, bad production values, sloppy editing, poor visual design, it was both rushed and too slow, and nothing made sense. If you paid someone to deliberately fuck up everything about the show, they would not have been as effective at it because it would have been obvious.

      • emenaman @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Compare it to this… Watching a highly rated chef come up with the most amazing sounding and looking dinner meal over the course of a few hours. You are anxiously awaiting to take a bite and salivating for that moment. When you finally get served your plate and get to that scrumptious first bite, the biggest wave of disappointment hits and you lose your appetite.

        I don’t know how else to explain it

        • Banzai51@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          And the plot points they decided to skip earlier in the season stuck out like a sore thumb. If you read the books and knew where they left off, you could see how those elements fit into the ending and made it a ton better.

      • Puppy@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tldr; the whole 6 first season they set up the table for some really juicy stuff and in the last season, some side quests were either ignored or fast-tracked to fit in 1/3 of an episode. Realistically, you had content for at least 3+ more seasons. But since GRR Martin is so slow to write his books (I don’t blame him, just pointing out the obvious), the producers of the show had to cut corner and take huge liberties that didn’t make any sense

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The first seasons had the books with everything spelled out.

        The end wasn’t (still isn’t) written. So the show runners were told who gets the iron throne at the end, but not how/why. Also a few other ending points.

        So in the show, there’s no good reason for what happens at the end. D&D just had shit happen rather than try and show why people would do that shit

  • NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    187
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Zero sympathy. If they wanted to reduce the amount of illegal streamers, all they’ve got to do is make their content more accessible.

    Release it on multiple streaming platforms, not just their own. Ensure its released globally at the same time. And get rid of the geo-blocking.

    The lack of reasonable legal alternatives is what drives piracy.

    • Square Singer@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      1 year ago

      As evidenced by the brief moment in history when Netflix was all that and it drove video piracy all but to extinction.

      • ashok36@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is the case still with Spotify, apple music, deezer, etc… Multiple services with few if any exclusives means almost all music piracy has stopped. Somehow, the record companies continue to survive.

        • Metacortechs@lemmy.stellarvortex.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think we’re going to start to see music services going that way soon, for the first time I’ve started to see that songs in my primary play list are now not available in my region.

          I admit I dont know what songs yet, am on a road trip at the moment, but it makes me worry that it’s going to get worse.

      • 雨 月@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That´s so insane, right? I mean, they practically had us in the bag with netflix. People either had their own account or chipped in to use someone elses one BUT EITHER WAY, THEY PAID FOR IT! And then came one of the rare moments where more competition was actually bad.

        • pinchcramp@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think with digital content platforms in general, competition means more headaches for customers.

          The store front/streaming service is not what people sign up for, but the access to a certain movie, show or game. If the catalog of all available pieces of content gets scattered across multiple services you now have to use multiple apps, pay multiple subscription fees and search through multiple catalogs.

          I’d say from a customer’s perspective, increased competition lead to a worse situation.

          • Square Singer@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            The thing here is that, for the most part, it’s not actually competition, but a collection of monopolies.

            You want to watch show X? You have to go to the streaming service that has the monopoly on show X. It you want to watch that show, in many cases you can’t just substitute it for a different show.

            If you have five stores selling all sorts of food, then that’s competition. If you instead have a butcher, a baker, a candy shop, a dairy shop and a fruits/vegetable shop, that’s splitting the turf. You can’t just substitute the ground beef for your burgers with skittles, because the butcher is more expensive than the candy shop.

            Caveat to this argument: If you really don’t care about what you watch, then these different streaming services really are interchangable competitors and then the competition is good, because e.g. a shared Disney+ account is much cheaper than the now-non-shareable Netflix account.

          • 雨 月@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, It´s kinda fucked up since normally, competition is good for the customer. It´s a good thing to have different stores you can go to. It´s a cood thing to have different car or moobile phone brands to chose from.

            With streaming though, I can´t really think of any real world situation where the customer actually is worse off with more variety to chose from.

        • willeypete23@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not the competition that’s bad! It’s the anti competitive laws that allowed it to spoil. Companies saw how profitable Netflix was and pulled their shows from the platform to artificially create a reason for consumers to use their own shitty services. Netflix was no longer able to purchase those titles.

          • 雨 月@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What does this have to do with laws though? I find it pretty reasonable for a film company to be able or allowed to run their own streaming platform and just not sell their shows to say netflix. If I create something that I want to sell my self, in my own store, there should be no law forcing me to also hand it over to that supermarket down the streat to sell it there. And if I want to charge a monthly fee for even being able to enter my own little store, that should also not be prohibited.

            Imagine there would be a law that said, every studio would also have to sell their stuff to netflix. You think, Netflix wouldn´t immediately abuse this power to drive any competition out of business?

            Don´t get me wrong, I HATE that to be able to watch all the stuff I might be interrested in, I´d have to subscribe to like 5 different services. I just don´t see how laws would be a good tool to deal with that.

    • Obsession@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I would need even more. Let me buy it digitally. Not streamed, not with some draconian DRM. Just let me buy the MKV files straight from HBO, and I won’t pirate them.

      They have to be aware of how easy it is to rip a blu-ray, yet those are still for sale. So let’s just skip the middleman and give me legal remuxes.

      • Pulp@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even (some) porn sites (both paid and free) have drm free download buttons on their sites.

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tbf Blu Ray is a good distribution media. It’s the DRM that’s ruining it.

        The DRM pipedream has been going on for so long in the industry that it’s basically dogma at this point. Everybody knows it doesn’t work but they’re in too deep to question it.

        • MyFairJulia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh dear, don’t get me started on that. I had to buy expensive software to play back the few Blu-Rays i have. CyberDVD doesn’t even allow you to skip intro videos and anti-piracy crap. You know, the crap we didn’t do when we bought the medium or ignore anyway if we create our own backups or share the media illegally.

          Also i hate region-locking. I bought the complete Daria DVD collection which lacks the original soundtrack btw. And i am not permitted to watch it because what? International copyright? Technological differences we overcame long ago?

          I can switch the region of my blu-ray drive in my PC 5 times. After that it will stay in the last configured region. A very, VERY arbitrary limitation!

      • Emu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean… you can just pirate/download it, it takes literally 10 seconds once you know how… and to know how takes like 2 minutes lol

        • Obsession@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wouldn’t be on this subreddit if I didn’t know that.

          But I would also buy a lot more media if I could buy it in the way I want

    • Midas@ymmel.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I remember here in the Netherlands that you could only watch HBO through a specific internet provider (ziggo-Vodafone). I’d have to switch goddamn ISP’s to pay for their show. That gave me all the justification to pirate the shit out of it.

      • TechnoBabble@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can’t fathom why these media companies still love to do exclusivity agreements. There’s no way it’s more profitable than just allowing everyone to watch your show from any service, with commissions for the number of views.

        I’d probably start paying for a streaming service again if I could watch every show in one place. But I’m not interested in playing musical subscriptions.

    • Takatakatakatakatak@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ensure its released globally at the same time

      This was easily the biggest driver. For GOT, I had legal access but I was expected to wait over a month, by which time because the internet - the spoilers would have been completely unavoidable.

      • Terrasque@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Reminds me of Shrek 2. Which premiered 6 months after the US in my country.

        I wanted so badly to watch it in cinema, but internet talked about it, friends talked about it, and I had people coming over with burned copies wanting to share it with me…

        Yeah, I did not see it in cinema. For some reason it didn’t do well here.

        • Takatakatakatakatak@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It just seems removed not to do global releases at this point. Like we’re all connected as hell. How do you expect to make one country wait 6 extra months? Just dumb. Lost revenue for no reason.

    • Saneless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And someone who knows better please correct me if I’m wrong, but 10 years ago for streaming is an eternity ago.

      I believe back when the show was new and hot you could only watch HBO WITH a cable subscription

      There’s a reason people pirated it instead of just subscribing

      Ok, I was right: this late 2014 article says they’d finally offer standalone “next year”

      https://www.tomshardware.com/news/time-warner-hbo-stand-alone-subscription-netflix,27892.html

      Edit: April 2015 is when it started. So quite a bit after GoT started

  • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    ·
    1 year ago

    Instead it was destroyed by two greedy fucks rushing the ending two seasons early so they could move on to their next cash grab flop!

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, theres more than a few reasons Martin hasn’t finished the books. A major one being that the style of writing doesn’t benefit from ending, its mostly a constant series of escalations without ever resolving anything. At a certain point no resolution will ever be satisfying.

      Not saying the show ending couldn’t have been better, but like shows like Lost or Heroes, or all those shows like that, no ending could ever live up to the hype generated during its run.

    • Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve always lived by lord GabeN’s “piracy is a service issue. You have to offer a better experience than the pirates”

      • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That dude is one in a billion. I am kinda scared what will become of valve once he retires or even dies. I swear to god if I lose access to my steam library I will never buy a single damn piece of media ever again.

      • another_lemming@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can we say Gabe’s practice can translate to movies\shows? His products are at least 10hr worth (thus worth subscribing and enjoying an occasional sale), can be further promoted by having multiplayer, cloud saves, achievements…

        It’s true this old blood can’t understand pirated MKVs are better than streaming-only DRMed shit. But is there anything they can really do to make their services work?

        I think that it’s not a problem of a service itself if it’s not too shitty, but promotional campaign with memes like the one of Squid Games. One can be a Hitler of streaming platforms, but if this show is the new Lost, you’d make a bank anyway.

        • Takatakatakatakatak@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          is there anything they can really do to make their services work?

          Once upon a time we had netflix. Almost everything you could want to watch was on there because they were just about the only show in town. During that time there was precious little reason to download most shows.

          Now in order to have access to the thing you want to watch, you’re expected to pay for 5 or 6 separate streaming services, by which point you end up at the same insane price point as paying for the full package of cable/PayTV channels.

          They had a good thing and they ruined it with greed, just like everything else under capitalism. Glorious state streaming network should be only show in town, comrade.

        • JDubbleu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was super into piracy when I was ~12, but as Netflix took over and you could get everything you want with 2-3 subscriptions totalling <$20 per month I eventually stopped because it was easier, a much better experience, and worth the money. Now that there are too many services to count guess who has an RPi BitTorrent/Plex server? I’d prefer to go back to the old Netflix way of things as it’s so much easier, but there isn’t any option more convenient than my current setup.

          If I could pay $50 a month and get everything I want content-wise I would, but I cannot. Not counting that half the subscription services are awful to use, or are missing major portions of series,. I’ve even started pirating content I pay for access to because I don’t have to deal with DRM bullshit.

          With Steam though I’ll pirate a game, and if I like it I’ll go buy it because it’s a better experience. Gaben is 100% correct that you have to provide a better experience than pirates, otherwise why would anyone pay for a worse experience?

        • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, they just have to start thinking outside the box they built around themselves for once.

          Here’s an easy one: watch parties. You and your friends can watch the show together far away. You have integrated voice and video chat maybe, and pausing pauses for everyone.

          Free shows or free teasers for shows. Not paying for a sub? You can watch the first 2 episodes of Brooklyn 99 for free, and avatar the last Airbender is free to watch or whatever.

          That’s not even scratching the surface. Netflix spent so much time building features that nobody uses (trivia and Minecraft story mode have almost good software behind them, why can’t you do it easily with friends?), They could do something good but won’t because God forbid they lose out on short term profit.

  • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    There was a point in time when GOT was only available via an $80 a month pay tv subscription after the earlier seasons were aired on regular television. Once again, piracy is an access issue - not a theft issue.

    • Rearsays
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not only was it hard to get the subscription, but it was hard to get it in your country if you weren’t US

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Canadian here. Cost us 10 or 20 bucks amonth as hbo was included in a package with other services.

        Which as a canadian feels FUCKING WEIRD to brag about our telecoms for a change.

        Crazy times

        • Rearsays
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think that it’s reasonable to have to subscribe for one show. I know what you mean by your comment about Canadian telcos they’re dogshit.

          I don’t think got was available in Australia iirc

  • inverimus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 year ago

    They fail to mention that when GoT started in 2011, HBO wasn’t available at all without a cable TV subscription, so people who had already dropped cable didn’t have any other choice. HBO streaming without cable didn’t become available until 2015.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I don’t think I’m all that special and I pirated the earlier seasons of GoT. The later seasons I watched legally, because by then it was available on a local streaming site I could well afford. If pirating wasn’t an option it wouldn’t have meant I would’ve spent the money to subscribe to a cable package that included HBO, (which would’ve cost a lot because you had to get some expensive bundle) I just wouldn’t have watched GoT at all. So they didn’t really lose anything from it.

      And it’s possible I may not have watched the later seasons legally either, because “eh… too late to get into this thing now.”

      HBO is a luxury thing and something like GoT could be the thing that’ll entice people that could afford it and were thinking of getting it anyway to subscribe. The most relevant thing that influences their subscription numbers is the average income of the middle class, not piracy.

      • Greenskye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most likely the entire HBO streaming service wouldn’t have taken off, because they offered little to no avenues to consume their content to an increasingly no-cable subscription generation. It’s entirely likely that HBO would’ve died out along with traditional TV.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    TIL 2.2bn in profit is basically poverty profit, not even worth doing it … and all because of them evil pirates who would have totally payed for Netflix if they couldn’t pirate it.

    However, I really loved all the memes and r/freefolk, great stuff that got exponentially better with each season.

  • KairuByte@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    For a while there it was nigh impossible to legally get access to GOT in certain countries. Not to mention, when your only option is an insanity expensive streaming service, and the only thing you want there is one specific show, you’re likely to look for alternatives.

      • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, the only way we can get that is through Foxtel. Which is, and had always been a cable company.

        Though it looks like various HBO shows are on various other streaming platforms - GoT appears to currently be on BINGE

        And there are also a few on Stan and and netflix, but the vast majority of them are still locked to Foxtel.

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not even just “certain countries”, in the U S of fuckin A.

      The first four seasons, arguably the best seasons, were only available to HBO subscribers. The only way to get HBO was to be a cable subscriber. So you were paying probably $100 a month to watch one show. There is NO WAY that was going to be successful. This was the rise of Netflix. I could pay $100 per year for their content. By 2014/2015 I was getting House of Cards, Orange is the New Black, Bojack Horseman, it was a great time.

      Now lucky for HBO Game of Thrones is a powerhouse. So what do they do in 2015? They launch HBO Now… as an iOS exclusive. I want to pay you but you cut out half your audience? Guess I’m pirating Season 5 too.

      Finally by season 6 HBO Now is available for everyone. I’ve now watched the majority of the show by pirating it. I don’t fault anyone who continued to do so. And this was the American experience. I can only imagine how other countries handled it.

      Game of Thrones wasn’t in jeopardy because of piracy. Game of Thrones only succeeded due to piracy. It was a fantastic show (in the early seasons) but doomed to “cancelled too soon” without piracy.

    • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup, I would have had to subscribe to sky for at least two years to watch it. Their weird monthly streaming service did not even include GoT and it was 720p max and it would not allow you to watch anything, if you got a 2nd monitor connected. That shit is as anti-consumer as it gets.

  • Banzai51@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bullshit. While it was the most pirated show no doubt, It did drive HBO subscriptions and BluRay sales. The drastic fall off in show quality after season 4 did it in.

      • HeavenAndHell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Unless the headline was being sarcastic, nowhere in the article does it explain how it was “nearly destroyed”. If the article author isn’t going to put any effort into writing it, why should anyone put any effort to reading it? Just the typical clickbait garbage.

      • NightAuthor@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are we supposed to?

        Idk there’s comments here, I was expecting to get all the relevant parts extracted for me (as I do in other posts I come across)

  • pectoralis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wasn’t even able to stream it legally in Canada. The only way I could watch it legally was to get a cable subscription and a $15/mo HBO package. Fuck that!

    • sab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That sounds like a contradiction.

      Edit: For everyone else who doesn’t bother to read the rest of the thread: it hadn’t occurred to me that buying HBO doesn’t include video on demand. But now I do. You don’t have to tell me. I know now. What I’m saying is you don’t need to tell me. Because I already know. So there’s no need to tell me, for I already know.

        • sab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh wow, it hadn’t even occurred to me such a subscription wouldn’t include the ability to watch on demand. That’s so last century.

        • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          32
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So he was able to stream it legally, he just wasn’t happy with the requirements for doing so.

          Edited to add, I think I’ve misunderstood the original poster. I thought they were saying they could stream it if they had cable. Now I’m not sure that’s what they meant.

          For those saying I was being pedantic, I don’t think it’s pedantic to refute that someone said they can’t do a thing when they can. But again, I think I misunderstood.

            • ledditor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              The Reddit Pedantic-Olympics are starting up again…

              I don’t know why internet commenters think it’s such a zing to “correct” someone when it’s quite obvious what they mean.

              • HeavenAndHell@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                This isn’t being pedantic, it’s obvious they meant they couldn’t stream it over the internet and had to watch it on scheduled cable. It’s not even semantics. People just need to fully read a sentence.

                • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It was not obvious to me at first because some on demand services require a cable TV account to access. That’s what I thought they initially meant.

            • pectoralis@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It is not. But GoT was not available to stream in Canada. Without any streaming options, piracy was the only way to watch… Unless of course I wanted cable and HBOs pricey package.

          • Goathound@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            To add to what burndown said.

            Before streaming services were the de facto place to watch movies and TV at home, cable companies would charge a monthly fee to provide live cable TV. TV shows aired weekly and if you miss an episode on Cable, unless you happened to set it to record, you can’t watch that episode until the network decides to air it again, hours or days later, what was known as a “rerun.”

            Cable is a live broadcast sent from the cable provider, (think youtube livestreams that play family guy 24/7) streaming is an on-demand platform for content. So in Canada, if the only place to watch Game of Thrones legally is cable, that limits your viewing time, what episode you watch, and the order in which you watch the show/movies, greatly impacting the viewing experience.

            So cable and streaming are separate, cable is more expensive and less enjoyable than streaming, but at the end of the day they’re two different methods of watching TV.

            • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ll just add that the last part about streaming being cheaper isn’t so true as when the show was airing. Cable companies (some at least) have seen the writing on the wall and have dropped prices and with the abhorrent amount of exclusivity crap going on with streaming services and ever increasing fees on everything, a lot of people have found it’s cheaper for them to go back to cable. Keeping in mind a lot of cable services include a streaming branch of their service now so the days of horrible inconvenience are dying out. It’s quite fun to see for those of us who hate the practices going on in streaming lately.

            • wsweg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not sure if it’s the same in Canada, but the US has an insane amount of people who pay for cable still, even in areas with high speed internet. I honestly don’t understand how people like it, especially with how expensive it is. It’s even worse if they have satellite and it cuts out during storms.

      • pectoralis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        How so? There was no streaming option in Canada for GoT. HBO max was not offered. I even tried with a VPN but they wouldn’t accept a Canadian credit card. So piracy was the only option unless I wanted to get cable… But who would want that.

  • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    get your credit card stolen.

    Let’s see… I don’t provide my credit card to anyone when pirating. The only way they are getting my credit card is breaking into my house. (no, mkv files can’t have viruses).

    But I do need to provide my credit card info to HBO, which they store, on their likely poorly secured servers.

    The number of credit cards stones from data leaks very likely exceeds the number of them stolen because someone got duped when trying to pirate.

    • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      mkv files can’t have viruses

      That’s not true. Though it’s harder to do than your standard virus-in-an-exe.

      which they store, on their likely poorly secured servers

      That most likely isn’t true, these sites don’t store your credit card info, they leave it to the payment processors precisely because they don’t want to deal with securing the data.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Exactly, they are literally trying to scare people. There is objectively a lower chance of getting your credit card stolen from pirating than getting your credit card stolen from purchasing content legally.

  • Rolivers@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    It was only possible to watch GoT in the Netherlands when you were with one specific provider. That’s what caused piracy.