• kitnaht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 days ago

      Yes, but did you vote? – Except, for me, no /s. If you didn’t vote, you’re the problem.

      • randomdeadguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        How so?

        Edit: I am serious, this warrants an explanation. Not voting does not fix a broken system. Voting also does not fix the broken system. Shaming apathetic voters can help increase voter turnout. Increasing voter turnout does not make a more perfect union. But that’s too sad to think about, so downdoots to the left, please, and ignore my point. No wonder I’m clinically apathetic.

        Edit 2: after threats of violence I would like to take the time to retract any unpatriotic statements. Our union may not be perfect but it’s the best one we have.

        • kitnaht@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          21 days ago

          If you don’t like where shit is heading, and you’re not part of one of the only tools we’re given to correct course, then it’s the same as pure apathy.

          Coming online and removed about it is next to worthless. Slacktivism at its finest.

          • randomdeadguy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            21 days ago

            If you’re just here to suggest the same tired idea and insult strangers I don’t think you have a strong argument

            • kitnaht@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              Weird, mind pointing out exactly where I insulted you? Because playing victim isn’t an argument at all; despite you believing my argument is ‘strong’ or not. The topic at hand is voting, and I explained myself. All you’ve done is make excuse after excuse.

              • randomdeadguy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                21 days ago

                Sure buddy, no problem.

                • removed on the internet
                • next to worthless
                • Slacktivism

                The topic at hand is: I don’t want to chat with you further because of the way you communicated. I would prefer to discuss this with someone who does not communicate this way.

                So, thank you so much, but I’m just going to have to stop now because my worthless removed and playing-the-victim strategy was no match for your powerful logic. You are superior to me. You win. I lost. You saw through me and my excuses-after-excuses ploy. Blast! Until next we meet, fated interloper.

                • kitnaht@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 days ago

                  You should really get some better reading comprehension. “removed is next to worthless” was the context. This is of the topic regarding voting. Voting is what you do - removed on the internet doesn’t get candidates elected.

                  And I told you what you were doing was slacktivism. That’s literally the definition of it – going on the internet and removed about things, instead of…

                  Voting.

                  The fact that you believe that those were insults directed at YOU as a person, instead of your actions…is where you need to grow. You can do better. If you want to.