“People will either agree with that conviction or they won’.”

    • frauddogg [they/them, null/void]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      No actually fuck the petty endzone dancing: make this shit make sense. How the fuck is Adobe execs saying “adopt our malevolently-designed Intellectual Property-stealer malware AI agent or lose your livelihood and become destitute” not the same kind of violence that artists saying “Adobe execs need to be shot” is? Practice what you preach, scab.

      If you don’t want people advocating for bringing back labor raids on corporate scum, don’t uplift the violence that corporate scum inflict on us,

      SCAB.

      Fuck your civility politicking.

  • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    24 days ago

    Adobe execs need to be kissed good night to sleep in their beds. This is a very reasonable policy. Intellectual property rights are a thing that makes a lot of sense. The commons are definitely not being encircled by people who have names and addresses.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      The interesting part is that Adobe has a lot of IP. You don’t see them saying that you can freely use it.

  • olicvb@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    24 days ago

    How about we switch it around: “Artists are telling Adobe to embrace their creative needs or risk being left behind.” Adobe is forgetting that Artists are the ones providing their revenue

  • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    It should be noted that Adobe can fuck right off, and computerized art is not the only kind of art. It is generous to even call it art. It’s still all called graphics in my opinion.

    I think they’re worried.

  • xia@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    24 days ago

    Without constant influx of fresh art, AI will devolve into deep-fried absurdist memes. :)

        • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          And GhostScript!

          Pandoc and LaTeX as an alternative to InDesign for book and paper publishing. Obviously not a direct replacement since they are macro languages and not GUI tools, but they are free and open source and capable of creating great looking output if you put in the time. There’s tons of free learning resources out there too.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    24 days ago

    Adobe executives need to embrace being dropped in favor of non-AI programs or be left behind.

  • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    I’m at an absolute loss as to why people use Adobe. It’s hot garbage and the price is WAY out of league. It’s a shining example of the open market not existing/working as advertised.

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 days ago

      It’s exactly because of capitalism that everyone is using it. Adobe bought off and killed all alternatives projects. So most people are now dependent on Adobe for their workflows. There are alternatives now, but people are still being dumbasses and are sticking with Adobe instead of taking a small loss to re-learn with alternatives.