• CTDummy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’m providing some of the reasons I’ve read or heard from the campaign. Not that I support them or their validity. Regardless of whether people “could” have sought it out if labour wanting to put forward these changes the onus is on them address all the “concerns” either directly or by be being more informative in their campaign.

    Which is all an aside, my point remains there were other reasons people didn’t vote yes contrary to what the writer of the article asserted.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Cool, but yeah, I do think modern western government are struggling to get messages out in the digital age of media consumption. People don’t have to go look for info, and often don’t care to, so they get bubbled in their own algorithms.

      • CTDummy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Agreed, even worse is algorithms continual boosting of “ragebait” or emotion centred content. Why read/watch an article that will “just” be informative when you can watch something claiming how any step forward means you’ll lose something.