I mean, you take one look at Greek statues and Roman busts and you realize that people figured how to aim for realism, at least when it came to the human body and faces, over 2000 years ago.

Yet, unlike sculpture, paintings and drawings remained, uh, “immature” for centuries afterwards (to my limited knowledge, it was the Italian Renaissance that started making realistic paintings). Why?

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    THE PROPER TOOLS.

    YOU try scrawling on a cave wall with nothing but the charcoaled end of a stick you pulled out of a fire and see how well you can draw with that kind of medium and tools.

    As technology progressed, so did the tools used.

    Michelangelo was using a fresco technique painting onto still wet plaster and used egg whites or glue made from animals to help the paint stick. He used a variety of brushes, not just a charcoal stick.

    Further, just something as simple as a variety of colors took hundreds of years of technological advancement to achieve.

    Don’t underestimate the need for quality tools!

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s true. Though not a complete answer, because realism lagged behind the tools needed for it. And it’s interesting how once one person can do it, suddenly everyone can do it. That says something shit is as a species. We can only do what we’re able to imagine? And as soon as we see someone do it, that barrier is gone?

    • kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      something as simple as a variety of colors took hundreds of years of technological advancement

      If anyone is looking for a rabbit hole to go down, the history of pigments is a great one.

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Also the time needed to perfect that skill wouldn’t have been available that far back. If you’re needing to spend the bulk of your time hunting/gathering food and other forms of basic survival I don’t think you’d have the hours every evening to work on your shading techniques.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Excellent point, as others have astutely pointed out, a love of the arts is often cultural, and most artists need essentially a set of people who love their art and buy it or they will be a “starving artist.” So you also need a society that appreciates art enough to let certain people have all that time.