That and verifying the checksum are the big reasons I can think of. I feel like for the most part though using something like balenaEtcher is so much easier.

  • potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 minutes ago

    I feel like for the most part though using something like balenaEtcher is so much easier.

    Take 5 minutes to learn to use DD, and you’ll never need to install etcher again. Also DD can do primitive backups of drives, and so much more.

  • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    49 minutes ago

    It’s because the Linux desktop landscape is a complete and utter mess. Any standard Linux GUI has a tool to make a bootable flash drive, but the steps to get there and the buttons to click are all different. Using the command line often works on every platform. I generally use Gnome’s disk tool, though KDE’s partition manager is also very competent. On the more minimal distros, Gparted always seems to work for disk operations. I’ve never really had any problems because of a bad cbecksum when it comes to Linux but I’m pretty sure there are GUI tools for verifying those too.

    Among some Linux users there’s also a feeling of superiority about using the command line instead of the GUI, but those people usually come from distros that expect their users to know what a dd is and how to find the right drive in /dev. Those users seem to throw their hands in the air and go “download <some GUI tool>” when you ask them about Windows, though, because they don’t seem to care about the command line in Windows (even though Powershell is equally competent and in some areas even superior to most Linux shells).

    Some people are all so annoyed by etcher’s large file size, but I can’t say I’m too annoyed about having to download 150MiB when I’ve just downloaded a 6.7GiB installer image that contains two office suites and five image editors in case I need them.

  • Ephera
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I feel like the main problem with balenaEtcher is that it requires downloading 150 MB, for a software that many people will use only once before a reinstall.
    If you’re in a rich country, you might hardly notice, but for poorer countries, this is an insane ask, especially if it just improves convenience mildly.

    But yeah, ultimately any such tool is going to face the problem that no matter how easy it is to use, you need to first install it, which needs to be explained.
    The usage of dd also needs explaining, but you don’t need to install it.

    Well, and another factor is that dd has been around since the dawn of time. Software like balenaEtcher tends to go unmaintained after a few years, at which point any documentation referencing it, will need to be rewritten. And it’s usually rewritten to reference dd instead, before a new convenient software emerges…

    • Corroded@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Thanks for explaining. I didn’t know it went unmaintained for a while. I thought programs like balenaEtcher and Rufus might have other issues I was unaware of like certain OSs not flashing correctly

  • Sinthesis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Not all linux systems are running a desktop GUI, for example…most servers. /edit to add or expand/ I use Etcher on my laptop but I use the command line with my server in the closet…plug in the USB, go back to my laptop and do everything remotely.

    Also, as a linux user/admin for 25+ years I’ve seen these apps come and go. Inevitably the app gains so much popularity that the dev wants some money for it… so they add advertising to the app. Then some other app comes along to replace it, rinse and repeat indefinitely. If your shell commands are POSIX-compliant, they’ll last for decades or more.