• Alk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I think we’re talking about two different things here.

    I agree that they have shitty predatory business practices. However, you did not sign an EULA saying that you could take their property. So even if they do take the things you bought from them away, you would be out of luck. The thing that needs to change is not allowing that to be classified as “buying”.

    What I’m talking about is “if buying isn’t owning” having anything to do with “then piracy isn’t stealing”. Buying not being owning is a great reason to pirate. Still doesn’t make piracy any more legal.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I mean, digital piracy isn’t stealing regardless of the premise that buying ≠ owning.

      Stealing is taking another’s property without the intent to return it. Making a digital copy is not taking any property, it’s creating a reproduction of it. The only place left to argue that piracy is stealing would be to say that you’re stealing the company’s theoretical revenue… but that revenue was never tangible property, being that it’s your money up until the moment you give it to them. Piracy is, and only is, copyright infringement.

    • metaStatic@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I see where you’re coming from now and totally agree.

      Whenever a concept is distilled to a catch phrase it always loses something.

      • Alk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yeah that’s true. I have no creative bone in my body so I can’t even offer an alternative to the catch phrase I am calling out, unfortunately haha