silence7@slrpnk.net to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 hours agoThe Case for Kamala Harriswww.theatlantic.comexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1109arrow-down19
arrow-up1100arrow-down1external-linkThe Case for Kamala Harriswww.theatlantic.comsilence7@slrpnk.net to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 hours agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squarenewfielinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·edit-29 hours agoWhat was McCains stance on all of the above? Pining for the party of Bush is pining for evil and diminished living standards
minus-squareBlackbeard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·9 hours agoNone of that has anything to do with Kamala Harris. Again, what the hell are you talking about? That paragraph is addressing CONSERVATIVES.
minus-squarenewfielinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·9 hours agoYou’re saying Kamala will help restore the GOP to the party of Bush and McCain. That is a terrible thing to admit. The neoconservatives are monsters who harmed the country, to say nothing of the innocents abroad who were tortured and murdered
minus-squareBlackbeard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·9 hours agoNo. I’m not saying anything. I didn’t write the fucking article.
minus-squarenewfielinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·9 hours agoSo you agree with me and disagree with the article?
What was McCains stance on all of the above?
Pining for the party of Bush is pining for evil and diminished living standards
None of that has anything to do with Kamala Harris. Again, what the hell are you talking about? That paragraph is addressing CONSERVATIVES.
You’re saying Kamala will help restore the GOP to the party of Bush and McCain. That is a terrible thing to admit. The neoconservatives are monsters who harmed the country, to say nothing of the innocents abroad who were tortured and murdered
No. I’m not saying anything. I didn’t write the fucking article.
So you agree with me and disagree with the article?
Typical