• chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 months ago

    The whole libertarian argument is that the government is just the most powerful gang who goes around extorting everyone to pay taxes. If we’re not morally obligated to pay up when it’s a small gang, why does morality change when it’s a large gang?

    • broken_chatbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      as a person coming from a totalitarian country, I would still prefer dealing with a single gang which also has its own welfare obligations can be corrected or overthrown when needed, than several mafia-like cartels which only care about extorting money from me providing nothing to both me and the society as a whole.

      governments have responsibility, too, it’s just some don’t accept it

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh definitely. That’s the argument from pragmatism which I wholeheartedly support. At the end of the day, we need to feed and shelter ourselves and keep ourselves safe from aggression and violence.

        The moral argument is a much more difficult one to tackle. Much has been written on this topic: consent of the governed, responsibility of the individual towards society and vice versa.