Would it make the internet better? Probably.

  • interdimensionalmeme
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    You’d think they’d have more sophisticated remedies than cutting it up. Which won’t improve anything, won’t change the incentives and will eventually put us right back where we started.

    I mean duck manifest v3, but the government abdicated their responsibility for 50 years and now they think they’re going to save us with solutions from 1930 ? Do better you ducks !

  • overload@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Would YouTube get shittier if Google was broken up? I was under the understanding that YouTube is a loss leader service for Google, but I still think its one of the best social media sites on the web. Even when you consider the number of ads (that doesn’t affect a revanced user).

    • Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Not neccessarily. A spun off YouTube would still have YouTube premium and ad revenue. They could also sell user data to 3rd parties (I doubt Google currently does it on a large since it’s in their interest to have a better ad network than its competitiors). A move similar to Reddit’s with their API and exclusive search agreement or agreements to feed certain videos to AI would both fetch a higher price and upset the quality less since the vast majorty of videos watched are found through YouTube itself.

  • NauticalNoodle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I really would prefer them to go after Amazon and Apple before Google, or at least all of them at once.

    • interdimensionalmeme
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They should practice on ISPs and other broken industries first before these level 0 bureaucrats head straight for Dracula castle after not doing their jobs for 50 years and the Bell system re-merged. Kill Verizon & atnt, for instance

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        before these level 0 bureaucrats head straight for Dracula castle

        Rather they are buddies with Dracula, so should at least play better than this

  • dgmib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Google isn’t the only tech giant that needs smashing into pieces, Microsoft, Amazon, Adobe, all need to be broken up. The tech industry shouldn’t be dominated by a few companies.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I am somewhat biased, as an employee of a big tech company - but I am okay with them moving into different industries as long as they don’t undercut while also providing just the worst employment experience of all time. It sucks to see nice startups from passionate people get steamrolled by a 100 person org full of people fearing for their job while some exec rides the coattails of their boss.

      I’d be more supportive of big tech if they were nice places to work, but many of them simply aren’t. They have “prestige” (whatever the fuck that means), but some of them are full of some of the most broken, beaten-down people you’ll ever meet.

      • interdimensionalmeme
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Co-opify them, wipe equity and put the workers in democratic control of their own subunits

    • tibi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      The tech industry shouldn’t be dominated by a few companies.

      FTFY

  • alphabethunter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    This article made my day a bit better. Google complaining how “radical” the changes proposed are is a sure indicator that they would likely cause some damage to them.

  • cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Not sure why they mention AI search, as it’s practically non-existent right now.

    • Zeshade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      As far as I know Google and Bing return AI results just above the usual web page results.

      In addition AI LLM tools like Copilot (the mobile app) and Perplexity which cite their sources with links to websites really make it easier to weed out the BS from LLM answers, if you use them carefully. In my case, these tools replace search engines in 80% of the searches that I do.

      • cum@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        If you’re following citations, may as well just search for the citations themselves… aka just a regular search engine.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The more I run searches on Google and queries through copilot the more my trust evolves.

        I use the one latched into Skype more, though.

        • Zeshade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The one in Skype works quite well and is usually not blocked by companies firewalls… Or so I’ve heard…