Here’s a good thread by a physicist about how this discovery was fundamentally a physics thing, even if it’s being metabolized by pop science as “godfather of AI” or whatever https://mathstodon.xyz/@johncarlosbaez/113272834785880929
Are they just slapping AI marketing terms on a 40 year old quantum field theory with temperature.
It’s just a fancy way of playing “hot or cold” like hide and seek slapping some tangental 40 year old quantum field probability (aka ODDS / percentaces) theory on what is essentually an “If then else” statement. We’ve been comparing data matricies for a long time before the AI buzzwords were marketed for research dollars.
It’s not like your are reading quantum spin states in your GPUs…yet.
Here’s a good thread by a physicist about how this discovery was fundamentally a physics thing, even if it’s being metabolized by pop science as “godfather of AI” or whatever
Here’s a good thread by a physicist about how this discovery was fundamentally a physics thing, even if it’s being metabolized by pop science as “godfather of AI” or whatever https://mathstodon.xyz/@johncarlosbaez/113272834785880929
However, other people have thoughts; here’s a decent few comments on it: https://lobste.rs/s/dvedwb/nobel_prize_physics_2024_awarded
Are they just slapping AI marketing terms on a 40 year old quantum field theory with temperature.
It’s not like your are reading quantum spin states in your GPUs…yet.
Am I wrong in this assessment?
Remember
THE GOD PARTICLE 
?