GiddyGap@lemm.ee to politics @lemmy.world · 1 day agoHarris' lead over Trump narrows to 46% vs 43%, Reuters/Ipsos poll findswww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up186arrow-down113
arrow-up173arrow-down1external-linkHarris' lead over Trump narrows to 46% vs 43%, Reuters/Ipsos poll findswww.reuters.comGiddyGap@lemm.ee to politics @lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-squareTheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·1 day agoI just called you unreasonable. We’ll see if the mods think that’s a violation of the TOS. Have a nice life, either way.
minus-squarejordanlund@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·24 hours ago“Unreasonable” isn’t pejorative. “Fucking unreasonable” would be removed.
minus-squareBlackbeard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·23 hours agoThen why was the comment removed?
minus-squaregivesomefucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·edit-21 day ago It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative) It’s literally right there… By your own admission: I just called you unreasonable That’s against civility rules. But what I said still stands, if you try again without the civility breaking parts, I’m willing to spend some time to help you understand.
I just called you unreasonable. We’ll see if the mods think that’s a violation of the TOS. Have a nice life, either way.
“Unreasonable” isn’t pejorative.
“Fucking unreasonable” would be removed.
Then why was the comment removed?
Not sure, I left it.
It’s literally right there…
By your own admission:
That’s against civility rules.
But what I said still stands, if you try again without the civility breaking parts, I’m willing to spend some time to help you understand.