I’ve noticed many people promote VPNs for torrenting to evade legal troubles in some places. But I wonder how do VPN companies get away with legal complaints? Especially if their servers are located in Germany or Japan, where piracy is heavily penalized.

p.s. I have never used a VPN for piracy, and I have never received any DMCA emails.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      But America is the world?

      Every time the spaceships come, it’s defending the white house, which is the most important house on the planet.

    • sakuragasaki46@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      And America controls all of the fucking Internet. Especially all main social networks and search engines.

      Americans, especially after 9/11 happened, feel entitled to catch criminals (or at least what they deem so) all around the world and beyond.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 month ago

        Okay … All of that could be true, and then some, and it still wouldn’t give the DMCA any legal jurisdiction in Germany, or Mexico, or anywhere else that isn’t America…

        Is this thread about some moral invective? Or is it about the DMCA?

        • sakuragasaki46@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          In a just world where everyone minds their own business, it would be true.

          It’s the fault of people who live there for not fighting for abolishment of this hellhole of a law.

  • bastionntb
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 month ago

    Its simple really. If you have an IP address on a torrent network, contact its owner. The owner of the IP will then be forced to contact the user… But if the owner doesn’t keep logs… Then they don’t know who the user is… And the claim can’t progress any further. But not all VPNs are created equal. Some keep logs. And that’s not good for privacy.

    For you not getting DMCA, you may use private trackers only. If not, maybe you got lucky, or you just ignored the emails from your provider or your provider doesn’t follow up with complaints.

    • haroldfinchOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      But it’s VPN providers who rent the servers that have downloaded the torrents. So they can basically say it’s not done by us, but the users of our service, and thus they don’t bear any consequences? It seems like such a good business model.

      VPN providers do not bear any responsibilities for providing services for piracy.

      The DMCA’s principal innovation in the field of copyright is the exemption from direct and indirect liability of Internet service providers and other intermediaries.

      So technically if VPN providers do not keep logs, you are fine. But since it’s impossible to know how VPN providers servers are implemented, still there are risks.


      I mostly use public trackers. Maybe it’s just my ISP doesn’t care.

      • bastionntb
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Correct. That’s also why it’s important to find providers thatchave passed many independant audits. Like ProtonVPN or Mulvad.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Plot twist: RIAA and MPAA own all the major VPN providers, and/or the data centers they rent from.

        /ConapiracyTheory

  • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 month ago

    FWIW, at least Nord and Express explicitly put on their terms and conditions that you’re not allowed to use their services illegally, Nord mentions a few usages including unblocking content that should not be available in your region.

    They also give influencers like YouTubers and Twitch streamers scripts telling them to show how you can unblock content, but apparently the T&C weighs far heavier in court.

    • haroldfinchOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Great comment. Here is an excerpt from Nord VPN’s TOS

      8.2 You agree that you shall not yourself and/or enable others to: •use, assist, encourage, or enable others to use the Services/Websites for any unlawful, illicit, illegal, criminal, or fraudulent activities, including … digital piracy … which might negatively affect provision of our Services to other users;

      A Snippet from Express VPN"s TOS:

      In using our Services, you agree not to: … Send, post, or transmit over the Services any content that is illegal, hateful, threatening, insulting, deceptive, or defamatory; infringes ExpressVPN or third parties’ intellectual property rights; invades privacy; or incites violence or any unlawful behavior.

      • Corroded@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I feel like that’s a lot of boiler plate stuff. It reminds me of Tom Scott’s video on VPN sponsorships not admitting they can be used as tools for piracy

  • foremanguy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you are just torrenting and using it for downloading some stuff and nothing more, use the cheapest as NordVPN or Cyber ghost these are good for this, BUT NOT FROM A PRIVACY POINT OF VIEW

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    ISPs turn off connectivity out of fear from lawsuits. Cox is contesting this, saying it’s too much of a burden (which it is) for both them and customers to turn off internet.

    Its also fucking dangerous to do that in this day and age.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Very dangerous because at that point you could see trolls connecting to any network and getting it at minimum temporarily shut down due to them deciding to do illegal stuff. I imagine they wouldn’t care what damage they cause until they get arrested, too.

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Medical emergencies and devices are more important than protecting shittily-protected systems.

  • BlueÆther@no.lastname.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    you could live in a 3rd world country that doesn’t care if individuals pirate. eg New Zealand