• metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Maintaining continuity of consciousness is the only thing that would make me feel comfortable with converting myself to a machine intelligence.

    • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      I hate to break it to you, but our meat brains don’t even have continuity of consciousness. We become unconscious all the time. The only real constant is the “hardware” our consciousness emerges from, but even that is always changing.

      • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Except our brains are still functioning. If they didn’t keep functioning, we’d be brain dead. The point is that there’s a common thread that connects every waking moment together.

      • terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t get the down votes. Did y’all forget about sleep? No one vividly dreams every night all night long. Often it’s the fade to black going to sleep then the sudden awakening.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            How would you know?

            How do you know you’re not a copy of yesterday’s you? If a clone has your memories and you’re not around anymore, then what’s the difference?

            • realitista@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              You’d have to experience death for the clone to continue being the only copy.

              • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                Yeah. In the example above the original is dead, and a clone with all of your memories up until the point of death is generated.

                In that case, there is continuity of concussions, at least as far as anyone can tell, least of all the clone.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              Don’t try to get philosophical about this. There is a hard difference between copying a brain and actually transferring consciousness.

              • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Don’t try to get philosophical about this.

                Er? It’s a philosophical conversation since, you know, brain uploading is not a thing.

                If you don’t want to engage in philosophy, you’re in the wrong place.

          • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            Obviously not, but what is the functional difference? If you can’t tell it’s happening, does it actually matter?

              • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Sorry, should have been more specific. If you died in your sleep every night and came back to life in the morning, and you couldn’t tell it was happening, would it matter?

                It’s not a question with a right answer, I just want to hear your thoughts about it

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I’m that case no it wouldn’t matter. It would make us all feel much better about the possibility of life after the body dies though.

                  • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    What if a copy of you woke up in the morning? So you could see your dead body from yesterday, but consciousness would seem as continuous to you as normal–you went to sleep yesterday and effectively woke up today, just in a different body? Would it bother you knowing you weren’t technically the same you as yesterday, even if it seemed like it to you?

    • _NoName_
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      What does maintaining continuity of consciousness look like to you? As in you are able to talk to your copy? And continue to live your normal life outside while your digital self lives their digital life?

      Or are you saying you want the transition to digital to be seamless, where your digital self remembers laying in a chair, a quick pin-prick, and then they’re in the digital realm?

      Keep in mind, we have zero understanding of how you’d get the meat consciousness to transition into the digital consciousness - it’s likely not even possible. The two options for copying are keep both alive or terminate the original somewhere before bringing the digital one online. There’s many ways to do both, but those are the two.