Some other pics:

  • bassomitron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I get that everyone likes to witch hunt AI art as if it’s the bane of humanity, but this is such an idiotic comment. You can literally Google the city.

    • ownsauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The bottom layer of the photo was altered, you can see something like a parked cae that repeats itself, middle of the OP image, the two bottom layers partially repeat.

      • bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Altered photo, sure. But this is a famously known city and suggesting it’s just an AI image is ridiculous. You can literally take 1 minute to search this city name and see countless night time images similar to this one.

        • Scolding7300@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I think the original photo posted was heavily edited, hence the complaints. Not sure if you were looking at the newer edit or not (see other comments for context)

          • bassomitron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            My man, it is. It’s only slightly altered. Like I said, there’s dozens of images online that look the same. I imagine the glitch at the bottom is an attempt to avoid auto copyright detection bots.