• Jeffool @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I wonder if Mozilla would’ve benefitted if something like Hello was still around when the pandemic hit. Hello was a Firefox feature that made video chatting easy. You just needed to click the link.

  • burgeoning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Another day, more Mozilla FUD. I just saw the switched on Linux guy posted some too. They arent a perfect company, but lets not pretend they’re exactly like google or a mini google. It feels almost coordinated to get you to feel like all companies are compromised, so you should just use the popular thing and forget about privacy and security.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Enshittification isn’t an overnight thing, red flags are building and it’s important to call it out.

    • disguised_doge@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It feels almost coordinated to get you to feel like all companies are compromised, so you should just use the popular thing and forget about privacy and security.

      People are criticizing Mozilla for the ads, tracking, and AI stuff. The stuff Google does. Criticizing Mozilla is not an endorsement of Google, in fact quite the opposite.

    • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      It is not really FUD to point out that Mozilla wastes ungodly amounts of money on projects of dubious utility instead of investing it into their browser. Their current trajectory doesn’t inspire much confidence either. Mozilla started to waste even more money on ‘AI’ features nobody asked for.

      • Mbourgon everywhere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Actually, their new AI thing is actually useful: stays on-device, and summarizes web pages and videos.

        But yes, they could stand to spend more money on the browser, and less on their CEO and other non-browser things.

        • interdimensionalmeme
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Also they made llamafile We need a slur for the obnoxious and deluded anti ai people

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            it’s a good idea to not look to deeply into the historic actions of the creator of llamafile. she’s pretty polarising.

            • interdimensionalmeme
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 minutes ago

              I don’t care who they are or what their Xitter history is.

              The tools is great, the tool is not backdoored. I ruthlessly use effective tools that I can get my hands on.

              Using open source software on its own does not even entails economic support for its creator.

          • Mbourgon everywhere@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I’ll be honest, when I first heard that Mozilla had come out with an AI I figured it was on the back of them trying a couple different ad scenarios, and assumed the worst. Pleasantly surprised by Orbit.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Mozilla doesn’t exist to fund Firefox. Firefox exists to fund Mozilla. It’s been that since the very fucking beginning: Mozilla is a general internet charity that makes money with a browser. It’s always been that way. It never has been any different. I may have to repeat myself: The purpose of Mozilla isn’t to fund Firefox the purpose of Firefox is to be a money-maker for Mozilla’s charitable causes.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          usually you invest in the main product to drive higher returns for diversifying. diversifying first means your baseline is unstable.

    • corbin@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The Mozilla FUD where I said I like Firefox and pointed out how many of the projects continued in some form after Mozilla ended them?

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Honestly a number of these were abandoned for reasons that are fair enough.

    Additionally, lots of these are open source and either have been or can be forked.

  • RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    20 dead Mozilla and Firefox products

    Those are rookie numbers!

    –A single Google product manager, probably

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The loss of FirefoxOS was quite a shame at the time, but i can’t say i miss the rest. Servo, on the other hand, is all but dead. Cannot wait to see what the future holds for the project

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Servo isn’t dead it’s just on slow burn. Also, under the umbrella of the Linux Foundation Europe. As far as Mozilla is concerned it has served its purpose: Prototype stuff that then got included in Firefox to get rid of a quite large amount of technical debt.

      The long and short of it is: Firefox is supposed to make money for Mozilla’s charitable causes. It’s not an end in itself, but a means to an end.

    • ravhall@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I think Firefox OS could have a successful reboot today. JavaScript frameworks were not what they are now, and between react, vue, svelte, and angular, I think we are in a good place.

      I feel electron and tauri have demonstrated how well JavaScript can be used for interface while allowing it to access system resources in a safe way.

      Perhaps it should not be run by Mozilla, though, IMO they should focus on Firefox.

    • kolorafa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      11 hours ago

      You mean they throw a lot of money at the wall hoping that something will stick?