Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoMusic was better when ugly people were allowed to make itmessage-squaremessage-square222fedilinkarrow-up1759arrow-down1138
arrow-up1621arrow-down1message-squareMusic was better when ugly people were allowed to make itDr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square222fedilink
minus-squareswim@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·1 month agoYour comment makes sense in the frame of “ugly people are allowed to make music,” my comment refers to the “music was better” part of the post. The ugly people you mentioned don’t support your comment’s argument against the original assertion because their music is terrible, not “better.” Some music sucked in the boomer’s days, made by ugly and pretty people alike.
minus-squareIAmNotACat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 month agoHe’s simply disputing the assertion that ugly people aren’t allowed to make music.
minus-squareswim@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·1 month agoYeah, that’s what the comment you replied to starts with.
minus-squareIAmNotACat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 month agoYeah so what’s your problem with what he said then?
minus-squareswim@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 month agoWhy did you reply to my comment to restate the first part of what I said?
Your comment makes sense in the frame of “ugly people are allowed to make music,” my comment refers to the “music was better” part of the post.
The ugly people you mentioned don’t support your comment’s argument against the original assertion because their music is terrible, not “better.”
Some music sucked in the boomer’s days, made by ugly and pretty people alike.
He’s simply disputing the assertion that ugly people aren’t allowed to make music.
Yeah, that’s what the comment you replied to starts with.
Yeah so what’s your problem with what he said then?
Why did you reply to my comment to restate the first part of what I said?