• T156@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    That is a different kind of machine learning model, though.

    You can’t just plug in your pathology images into their multimodal generative models, and expect it to pop out something usable.

    And those image recognition models aren’t something OpenAI is currently working on, iirc.

    • mustbe3to20signs@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m fully aware that those are different machine learning models but instead of focussing on LLMs with only limited use for mankind, advancing on Image Recognition models would have been much better.

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        I agree but I also like to point out that the AI craze started with LLMs and those MLs have been around before OpenAI.

        So if openAI never released chat GPT, it wouldn’t have become synonymous with crypto in terms of false promises.

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not only that, image analysis and statistical guesses have always been around and do not need ML to work. It’s just one more tool in the toolbox.

    • TFO Winder
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Don’t know about image recognition but they released DALL-E , which is image generating and in painting model.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Fun thing is, most of the things AI can, they never planned it to be able to do it. All they tried to achieve was auto completion tool.