• 5C5C5C@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    How exactly is an individual supposed to determine which cops will be good and which will abuse their power?

    Just as we can’t make a general statement that all cops are definitely bad, you can’t make a general statement that all cops in any particular country or town will be good.

    From a basic risk management viewpoint, it doesn’t make sense for anyone to accept the risk that any given cop won’t abuse their position, even if we were willing to accept that very few would actually do so.

    Cops have an extremely privileged status in society and the amount of damage that a bad one can do to an individual - on purpose or even by accident - is incalculable, including setting up an innocent person for capital punishment as we’re seeing unfold in Missouri right now.

    • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      I agree with you, you can’t know for sure that you’re with a good or bad cop.

      But you also have to comply with laws if you don’t want to get in trouble.

      I can only answer for my country and I can tell you that here you’re gonna waste way less time if you show what’s in your phone and we can see that you’re innocent.

      The time not wasted there might also be used to catch the person who’s really guilty.

      I’ll just give you an example even if it’s not reated to unlocking phones: A black BMW 335i is filmed hitting a pedestrian and the plate number finishes with a 5. We’re gonna need to have a look at every BMW within these parameters. If you prevent the police from checking your car by hiding it, a guilty guy might have more time to hide his car and a crime is gonna go unpunished, leaving a victim with no one to pay for his injuries.

      Of course, that reality might be different elsewhere. It’s just that I have noticed that on Lemmy cops are only seen as bad guys when, in my case, I spend a lot of time helping people.

      • rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        So you’re advocating for fewer civil rights (or at least for people not to exercise their civil rights) because it saves you time and money? Spoken like a true pig.

      • webadict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ll just give you an example even if it’s not reated to unlocking phones: A black BMW 335i is filmed hitting a pedestrian and the plate number finishes with a 5. We’re gonna need to have a look at every BMW within these parameters. If you prevent the police from checking your car by hiding it, a guilty guy might have more time to hide his car and a crime is gonna go unpunished, leaving a victim with no one to pay for his injuries.

        And if my car was in an unrelated accident but just happened to fit those criteria, you could use that as evidence against me (and not only that, but then stop trying to solve the crime because you’ve assumed the perpetrator.) It ALWAYS goes both ways. If the only way you can solve a crime is by violating people’s privacy without a warrant, maybe don’t be a cop.

        Cops are seen as bad guys because people like you argue for why rights shouldn’t apply to people, and making you get a warrant (aka doing your job) is seen as interfering with a crime.

        The worst part is, it is stupidly easy to get warrants here in the US, but the cops WILL make your life miserable if you make them get one.