ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 months agoThe rule of the anti-woke griftlemmy.worldimagemessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1310arrow-down19
arrow-up1301arrow-down1imageThe rule of the anti-woke griftlemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 months agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squareqaz@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up45arrow-down3·edit-24 months agoThis graph doesn’t make sense. How can you even more reach the bottom part? EDIT: This is what I mean
minus-squareThe Quuuuuill@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·4 months agoonce something is determined woke by the grift, it can only be the focus as long as it is the right level of popular for anyone to listen to the scam. something to beloved or obscure won’t achieve the desired outrage
minus-squareZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down4·4 months agoYour media either gets labeled as “gooner” or “not woke”.
minus-squareOwenEverbinde@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 months agoI actually found that part clever. Things do actually get declared “woke” and then become popular enough that the grifters declare it unwoke.
This graph doesn’t make sense. How can you even more reach the bottom part?
EDIT: This is what I mean
once something is determined woke by the grift, it can only be the focus as long as it is the right level of popular for anyone to listen to the scam. something to beloved or obscure won’t achieve the desired outrage
Your media either gets labeled as “gooner” or “not woke”.
Or gets stuck in a loop
I actually found that part clever. Things do actually get declared “woke” and then become popular enough that the grifters declare it unwoke.