Arthur BesseA to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoMicrosoft to Revive Nuclear Plant on Three Mile Island to Handle AI Processingwww.pcmag.comexternal-linkmessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1246arrow-down13cross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
arrow-up1243arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft to Revive Nuclear Plant on Three Mile Island to Handle AI Processingwww.pcmag.comArthur BesseA to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square50fedilinkcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
minus-squareQuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down16·2 months agoThis thing can’t continue.
minus-squareBearOfaTime@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down3·2 months agoWhy? It had a proper “fail-safe” incident. It functioned as intended.
minus-squareQuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoYes, it’s safe and all but using a whole nuclear power plant for AI is a waste of resources.
minus-squaresuperkret@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down8·2 months agoThey intended for it to partially melt down?
minus-squareArxCyberwolf@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·2 months agoDon’t twist their words. The plant, when faced with a meltdown incident, was able to shut down safely with no injuries or detrimental effects to anyone, as intended. The plant then operated safely without incident for another 4 decades.
This thing can’t continue.
Why?
It had a proper “fail-safe” incident. It functioned as intended.
Yes, it’s safe and all but using a whole nuclear power plant for AI is a waste of resources.
They intended for it to partially melt down?
Don’t twist their words. The plant, when faced with a meltdown incident, was able to shut down safely with no injuries or detrimental effects to anyone, as intended. The plant then operated safely without incident for another 4 decades.