• FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Lol.

    That doesn’t seem like I only post about Jill Stein.

    “Majority” =/= “only”. I said “majority”. 60% of the last ten seems a fairly reasonable majority to me, and I’m not going to go through literally thousands of posts to sort that out. Congratulations, you’ve managed to say I said things I did not say and argued successfully against those words I did not say. Again. You seem to like doing that. you also seem to like sealioning.

    which brings us to:

    I don’t write the articles, I just post them. There are a LOT of Jill Stein articles written every day by news orgs–far more than are written about other candidates. So that’s on the news, not me, friend. :)

    which is a comment you seem to be saying alot.

    Lets just be real for a second here. You’re only posting articles that put 3rd part candidates in a positive light. The majority of which are about jill stein, and none are exclusively about RFK. (that I have seen, no I’m not going through your spam). Similarly, in the generalized subs about news and politics, you’re not posting about any other candidates.

    See a pattern? you’re not “just” posting articles that news agencies are publishing. You’re publishing articles about 3rd party candidates (and not all of them, either.) that put them in a positive light. To be perfectly blunt: You’re cherry picking. So that comment you keep spamming when people call you out for this? yeah. I don’t buy it.

    • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      60% of the last ten seems

      But it’s not 60%

      which is a comment you seem to be saying a lot.

      Because it’s true.

      I have posted plenty of RFK articles. Again, you refuse to look at my post history.

      You’re publishing articles about 3rd party candidates (and not all of them, either.) that put them in a positive light. To be perfectly blunt: You’re cherry picking.

      OH! So that’s what you are pissed about . Ok, ok. So how many democrat articles do you all post where the democrats aren’t in a “positive light”?

      Also, I created an entire community where people can post as many positive democrat articles as they want. And I have a socialist community where I have posted over 500 articles and posts that portray BOTH main parties in a negative light. https://lemmy.world/c/socialist

      Again, you refuse to check my post history, but go on about how I mostly post Jill Stein articles. I can’t take you seriously, man. lol

      And I get to post what I want, when I want. Even if it makes you mad.