I support the writer’s guild strike because they are not part of the bourgeoisie. The same can’t be said of a lot of these rich actors who own a ton of capital themselves. So on the one hand, it kind of seems like the bourgeoisie is fighting the bourgeoisie on this one. On the other hand, not every actor in the guild is as successful as Tom Cruise, so some of those striking actors are working class.

  • diegeticscream[all]🔻@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a very common trolling tactic here to ask questions framed by wrongly presented facts.

    It’s not weird to push back against the wrongly presented facts; there are other answers here as well.

    Is the painfully dumb to me sorry.

    It’s ok, I think you’re painfully dumb too.

    • jkure2@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Defending leftism by driving off everyone interested in leftism, doing your part 🫡

      • diegeticscream[all]🔻@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        “leftism” doesn’t exist.

        It’s not weird to push back against inaccurate facts in a question.

        It is weird to newly join a community and immediately try to correct everyone else’s behavior.

        I am not a proselytizer, and I’m frankly disgusted by it. If someone with a question is turned away by a (polite) correction, they were never interested in the first place.

        • jkure2@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not correcting everyone else’s behavior I’m calling out some bullshit and standing by it, stay disgusted

          • diegeticscream[all]🔻@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’ve stated the following a few times, and it feels like you’ve ducked addressing it:

            It’s not weird to push back against inaccurate facts in a question.

            I feel like it sums up my stance pretty well.

            What is your argument against that?

            Should we accept inaccurate factual framing in order to answer a question?