• blazera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, claims need proof. In all caps you’re claiming the packet they received is CLEARLY invalid. I dont think you’ve seen it either to be able to make that claim. That link is just another article on the ruling, not the packet they received.

          • just_another_person@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s not me making a claim. You have no idea what you’re talking about 😂

            This is a court case that has been out there and decided. The ruling is in. Proof was presented at a fucking trial, where evidence is submitted and reviewed. This isn’t MY opinion, it is the opinion of the Nevada Supreme Court.

            • blazera@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              Well if you had the proof you would have taken your easy victory already, since you seem firmly against backing up your claims im just gonna cut out, reinforced in my belief that this court decision was coordinated democratic sabotage.

              • just_another_person@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                Are you allowed to be out of your holding cell?

                It went through FOUR courts, and all of them said the same thing. Your position again is that EVERYONE else fucked up here?

                You asked for forms, they are right there. You asked for proof, it’s right there. What in the fuck is your damage that you can’t deal with reality?