So maybe the huge worry people had after the news that WHO would classify it as cancerous was a little too much. I think the media could have reported on it in a bit more responsible way.

  • CoderKat@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nobody drinks diet sodas for the nutrition value. They drink it for the taste.

    And there is a benefit in not having sugar. Sugar is far worse. If artificial sweeteners mean you can enjoy the taste of something without sugar, that’s healthier. Not nutritious, but healthier. I mean, they’re saying up to 14 cans of diet coke a day is fine. But 14 cans of regular coke is 490 freaking grams of sugar and nearly 2000 calories (a pretty typical amount that many folks should have for the entire day). Obesity is a far bigger risk factor for most people.

    The anti aspartame thing is just a combination of crackpots, people who have fallen for the “appeal to nature” fallacy, and people who really want everyone to know that they’re better than you because they don’t drink soda.

    • ForestOrca@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You claim to have some clear ideas about why people drink diet sodas. Great. And wish to label me in your own way, not so cool. I was just talking about me, and why this is a non-issue for me. I have a significant educational background in diet and nutrition, and have chosen based on that education to avoid things that are not shown to be helpful, i.e. artificial sweeteners. Personally I happen to like tea, and tisanes, without sweeteners - caloric or non. Turns out tea is the most commonly consumed drink in the world.

      https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/the-worlds-top-drink

      It’s all good friend. We’re all wired a little differently. I’ll do me, and you’ll do you. Where we meet, is where things get interesting.