• uservoid1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 months ago

    I hope my budget would allow me both fair-trade landmines and carbon-neutral nucs, both are important to keep our killzone environmental friendly.

    • Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Fake newz

      Carbon-neutral nukes aren’t a thing, but don’t need to be. Nukes have been well established to be a long term solution to global warming via Nuclear Winter.

  • merthyr1831
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is by UK artist Darren Cullen, aka SpellingMistakesCostLives. He also runs the Museum of Neoliberalism in the UK and has done a bunch of anti war/army/MIC pieces. All in all a decent dude.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Decimating population numbers is factually hella sustainable from the environmental pov.

  • OutOfMemory@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    I actually wouldn’t mind some biodegradable landmines that were only dangerous for 5-10 years or something. Imagine if we had those in WW2 Europe or Vietnam, those places would be much safer now if we did.

  • Hello_there@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    The seed bomb is actually viable. Coat the exterior in kudzu. The fragments will go everywhere and also kill your opponents long term production.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3524458/dod-exercises-option-on-second-micro-nuclear-reactor-design/

    DOD Exercises Option on Second Micro Nuclear Reactor Design

    Sept. 13, 2023

    As part of the Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO) initiative Project Pele, the Department of Defense (DOD) has awarded a contract option to X-energy, LLC of Rockville, Maryland in order to develop an enhanced engineering design for a transportable micro nuclear reactor.

    The DOD uses approximately 30 Terawatt-hours of electricity per year and more than 10 million gallons of fuel per day—levels that are only expected to increase due to anticipated electrification of the vehicle fleet and maturation of future energy-intensive capabilities. A safe, small, transportable nuclear reactor would address this growing demand with a resilient, carbon-free energy source that does not add to the DOD’s fuel needs, while supporting mission-critical operations in remote and austere environments.

    Way ahead of you.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s actually pretty cool but for a wartime setting that would be one huge, centralized and vulnerable target

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        There’s been some research into space-based solar power by the DoD for that exact reason. It was a while ago, but launch costs have come down substantially and the idea is possibly viable at this point. And even back then, IIRC it was projected to be less than we spent air conditioning the desert in Iraq.

  • Fedop@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Lazer guided seed bombs seems almost reasonable. And the impact creator tills the soil!

  • Einar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Phew. So glad we won’t run out of energy to kill each other. Was getting worried there. /s

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Looks like the vatican flag if vexillologycirclejerk got their hands on it

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    We need to look to the North Koreans for this kind of thing. They have a pretty decent army but they save lots of cost and environmental impact by not feeding them