• bluGill@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Likely far more energy and pollution needed to manufacture this though so overall a loss for the earth.

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        You still need a lot of energy to recycle steel. Less than mining by far but still a lot.

        • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          In a sustainable world, energy can and should be cheaper than raw materials. We are only harvesting a tiny fraction of the solar energy hitting the earth, to say nothing of wind and geothermal power. Rolling out more renewables and energy storage and using some of the surplus power to switch from extracting new resources to recycling our waste would greatly lower our footprint.

        • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          But compared to plastic from virgin fossil fuels?

          We as a society are going to need memory cards.

          What do you think they should be made out of?

          • bluGill@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Need to be examined on e case by case basis but plastic often comes out aheadi

            • Deceptichum@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              If you penny pinch and don’t want to pay the environmental cost, sure plastic might come out cheaper.

              But when you take into account the triple bottom line, plastic comes out behind.

              • bluGill@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Plastic in a landfill is a lot less harmful than co2 in the atmosphere.

                  • bluGill@fedia.io
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Sure but do you have any proof they are doing that? some places are really good and others really bad. Overall my guess is iron is still worse than plastic but there are exceptions.

    • Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Energy needs can be met and shouldn’t be an argument for using plastic.

      The pollution could be more dependending on how you look at that statement, but making something without plastic results in less plastic pollution and you can’t claim that to be an overall loss for the earth.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      You can swap out centralized energy sources (relatively speaking) overnight as greener sources become cheaper/more available compared to retooling whole industries away from plastic

      It’s the same thing with electric cars, yea it might plug in now to a dirty energy source, but that energy source could be a green energy source tomorrow without you ever knowing and importantly not having to buy a new car or change any other infrastructure to take advantage of it

      A power line is a power line, it doesn’t care if the electricity going through it was derived from a dirty power plant or solar or nuclear