• Pixlbabble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seriously I’m dumb but wouldn’t it just be transfer of heat? I was joking btw but now I’m invested lol.

    • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You need a temperature gradient to extract energy.

      The water is still cooler than the atmosphere just less than usual.

      It would be a few degrees warmer than deep ocean water, so you could maybe power one of those toy stirling engines with a heat sink near the surface and one deep down, but the amount of usable energy per m^2 would be milliwatts at best.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is a temperature gradient from deep water to shallow, the sterling cycle is just not efficient enough to gain energy with a massive deep-shallow-deep heat pipe system.

        • dudebro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s usually the information I’m looking for.

          Even if the concept works in theory, on practice it may not yield enough magnitude to be useful.