• Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I read that as “incentivizing keeping AI in labs and out of the hands of people who shouldn’t be using it”.

    That said, you’d think they would learn by now from Piracy: once it’s out there, it’s out there. Can’t put it back in the jar.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They should be doing the exact opposite and making it incredibly difficult not to open source it. Major platforms open sourcing much of their systems is basically the only good part of the AI space.

      • Monstrosity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Also, they used our general knowledge and culture to train the damn things. They should be open sourced for that reason alone. Llms should be seen and treated like libraries, as collections of our common intellect, accessible by everyone.

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not open-sourcing it is a terrible idea, it just creates more black boxes and gives corporations a further upper hand.