• sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      4 months ago
      1. @yogthos@lemmy.ml what you got to say for this one?

      2. Verge doesn’t run flulf for free. This is PR 101. But I trust you bro

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        The phone number is the key metadata. Meanwhile, nobody outside the people who are actually operating the server knows what it’s doing and what data it retains. Faith based approach to privacy is fundamentally wrong. Any data that the protocol leaks has to be assumed to be available to adversaries.

        Furthermore, companies can’t disclose if they are sharing data under warrant. This is why the whole concept of warrant canary exists. Last I checked Signal does not have one.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrant_canary

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          So we are still back to “I trust signal bro”

          I agree that their court disclosures are not a strong argument. I was hoping for something more technical besides faith based approach.

          If they were asked by the feds to log, they are able to do so it seems this far

          @helenslunch@feddit.nl

          Am I missing something in this position?