• Hexboare [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      bullshit math wizardry are they pulling out of their ass to argue that the exact ranking of each individual candidate

      If you’re voting in an election with ten candidates, but you only like two of them and equally despise the other eight, the “maths impossibility” arises because you’ll have to put a candidate you hate third

        • Hexboare [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yes, in Australian Senate elections you only need to rank at least 6 parties above the line or at least 12 individual candidates below the line on the long ballot paper

          In practice you might rank all ~100 candidates to try and avoid a couple candidates you hate the most

    • tripartitegraph [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I mean, you’re making a political argument, and one I don’t disagree with. But the point of the theorem is about an idealized voting mechanism, absent ideology. There’s absolutely arguments to be made about the usefulness of studying things like pure math, and I’m sympathetic to some of them, but even so, I think it’s important to know how the system we use to implement democracy actually functions.
      I think also the title is just pure clickbait, never take a youtuber at their word.