• threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 months ago

    Welp, that’s that. I wonder how this will affect future flights. Will NASA require an extra test flight prior to Crew-1? If so, Boeing will be one rocket short, as all of the Atlas Vs have already been allocated.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      No way Starliner flies again. This whole thing has been a gigantic fiasco from day one. I hope they pull the plug and spend the money on programs with a future.

      • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I disagree, they have so much time and money investment into starliner, it has to fly again. They can’t throw out 15 years of development.

        • SpacePirate
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Sunk cost fallacy. Fuck Boeing, why should the government keep funding this?

          • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            It’s not a usual cost-plus contract, to my knowledge, the government hasn’t funded it beyond the initial half billion. Boeing is taking a bath on this capsule development, needs the crew contracts to recoup, and that’s why I don’t believe they will abandon it.

        • ramchak@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 months ago

          They definitely should throw away 15 years worth of development if they are unable to deliver. Any more money spent would be wasted

        • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          They’re more than $1.5 billion in hole on this contract, but they must be doing some math on how many future contracts they might miss out on if they back out.

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Don’t throw good money after bad (or the sunk-cost fallacy).

          Though it’s not like all that development is lost. They retain all they’ve learned and developed. Just costs a bit to store the data.