I don’t like being referred to as a “person with autism”. I can’t just set it down, it’s not something I can remove. It is fundamental to the way I interact with the world, right down to how stim enters my brain. If my brain has types of inputs no allistic person can even approach, and methods of processing inherently different, it is an existence no allistic person can reach. There is no version of me that is not autistic.

A “cure” is the same as shooting me and replacing me with someone else.

The type of person I am is autistic. I am autistic.

I know it is a big trend in leftist spaces to use person first language, but in many situations that just sounds like eugenics to me. Personhood is not some distinct universal experience. There is no “ideal human mind” floating out there in the aether for them to recognize in me.

I get that person first language helps some people recognize that thoughts happen behind my eyes, but if the only way they can do that is by imagining I’m them, I don’t care.

  • CarbonScored [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Only because “blackness” isn’t really a typical (or technically appropriate) word? I’ve heard “people with darker skin” or equivalent and it seems to have been fine, in appropriate contexts.

    • Jelamzer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      People with darker skin sounds weird as fuck and is kinda meaningless phrase

      “Dark skinned people” is better

      • CarbonScored [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        As a cracker, I’m in no position to assert what is or isn’t better. But as I say, I’ve heard the phrase/equivalent used many times by many a person and it’s been fine.