It now says the case “warrants a sensitive approach.”

Disney tried to force the case into arbitration by citing the agreement on the widower’s Disney Plus trial account.

Disney has now agreed that a wrongful death lawsuit should be decided in court following backlash for initially arguing the case belonged in arbitration because the grieving widower had once signed up for a Disney Plus trial.

“With such unique circumstances as the ones in this case, we believe this situation warrants a sensitive approach to expedite a resolution for the family who have experienced such a painful loss,” chairman of Disney experiences Josh D’Amaro said in a statement to The Verge. “As such, we’ve decided to waive our right to arbitration and have the matter proceed in court.”

  • FantasmaNaCasca@lemmy.world
    99·
    3 months ago

    I met a shitposter from modern social media,
    Who asked with a frown, wrinkle lip
    And sneer of cold contempt:

    “Do you have some reason why you think
    This company with vast amounts of these
    stamped lifeless things
    Will go bankrupt and/or split up?”

    But regardless of all the corp-simping,
    In the future, only these words survive.

    "My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

    Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!

    Nothing beside remains. Round the decay

    Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare

    The lone and level sands stretch far away."

      • FantasmaNaCasca@lemmy.world
        21·
        3 months ago

        Some kind of Stockholm syndrome i guess.

        This companies violates us constantly, but most people are so traumatised by ads and social presure that they don’t see it anymore.

        I put ads before social presure due to comedy, but also:

        Ads eats brains. Thus creating mindless consumers. Oh look, the perfect consumer!