• JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s a big claim, that every free to play game is maliciously preying on people. Here are some counterexamples: Unciv, Minetest, Shattered Pixel Dungeon. I honestly would have expected to find more love and less hate for free games on a community that is usually such a FLOSS advocate.

          • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            From the article you linked

            There are several kinds of free-to-play business models. The most common is based on the freemium software model, in which users are granted access to a fully functional game but are incentivised to pay microtransactions to access additional content or more powerful in-game assets.

            • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Dude, the wikipedia-article is called Free-to-play. The preamble even says

              This article is about the business model for video games. For business models other than for games, see Freemium

      • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh, from what they said, it seemed like they were referring to the games themselves, rather than adverts about those games. But if they did mean the ads, then I agree, all ads are bad because they try to manipulate you to spend money - not just any specific ad or group of ads.

    • Bezier@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      You know exactly what kind of games it meant.

      If you want to turn this into a pedantic argument, I’ll just point out that the word “every” was your addition.