• GaveUp [love/loves]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Look I hate to be that girl but this is a terrible Business Insider tabloid shit

    Ubers are way cheaper than taxis still. Largely due to paying their workers way less than what cab drivers make. The article cherry picked a ride from downtown NYC and a trip from a busy airport

    Cloud computing is still way cheaper to rent than to build out by yourself. It’d take years and tons of millions yearly to get people to develop the same capabilities

    This is some weird contrarian Luddite article for boomers reminiscing about the good old days where capitalism wasn’t destroying the world nearly as much as it is now

    • FanonFan [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah they could have limited the scope to movie/tv streaming services and been fine. But music and video games streaming are still decent value propositions for consumers.

      Specialization isn’t inherently a problem, nor are centralization or decentralization. The problem ultimately comes down to private property and the resulting power imbalances and adverse incentives.

    • reverendz@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Cloud computing CAN be cheaper but it can also be way more expensive. It is not a panacea.

      It’s cheaper for companies that have unpredictable traffic/capacity. It lets you scale up/down without having build out physically.

      For businesses with steady, predictable traffic it can be far more expensive. You buy the servers, you own them. They can run for years.

      Cloud can get pricey veeeery quickly.

      • GaveUp [love/loves]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        If it was cheaper large companies would not all have moved to cloud, especially since it costs a very large upfront cost to migrate all that over if you already have a full setup

        Netflix used to have one of the best homegrown infrastructure and even they moved everything off to AWS

        I’ve worked at a place that mostly just served videos and had 100M users (no idea what the DAU/MAU was). The AWS bill was ~800k a year

        Just buying the land and building all the data centers across multiple continents would probably bankrupt the entire company, forget about building all that software and setting up the hardware and configs by themselves

        It’s only cheaper for tiny companies, but even then, no company ever has the goal of staying small