• volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            That’s exactly why the number of farmers keeps reducing under capitalism. In socialism, you can get to democratically decide how much people are paid depending on the actual needs of the economy.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          300 years ago, people were forced to farm for a lord.

          So are you suggesting a return to feudalism?

          • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            No, mate, I’m obviously not suggesting a return to feudalism. I’m suggesting that if humanity needs more people allocated in agriculture, it should allocate more people in agriculture.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              Allocate? People should be forced to farm?

              You’re right, that’s not feudalism, that’s slavery.

              • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 month ago

                Allocate doesn’t have to be through violence, it can be through incentive. If farmers made twice as much as stock traders and worked 30h a week there would be plenty more.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  It was already established at the beginning of this conversation by the person who started this chain that everyone would have equal pay.

      • d00ery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Then there’s a problem. However we somehow manage to employ a few billion people currently.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Those few billion people are currently not paid the same as an accountant to do much more demanding work.

          • d00ery@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            We’re talking about food production.

            I misunderstood you. Have more people doing farm work, that way we have enough food and individual farmers don’t have to work so hard

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              But what if you can’t find enough people to do farm work? A lot of people work on farms now because they don’t have much of a choice. And if you could do easier work but be paid the same as you would on a farm, why not take advantage of that?

              • d00ery@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                We already have people working lots of hours doing jobs they might not want to do.

                The question was could we reduce the number of hours people work and still have enough food