ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agoJPEG is Dying - And that's a bad thing | 2kliksphilipwww.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square146fedilinkarrow-up1356arrow-down125cross-posted to: jxlvideos@lemmy.worldtechnology@hexbear.netjpegxl@lemmy.worldtecnologia@feddit.cltechnology@beehaw.org
arrow-up1331arrow-down1external-linkJPEG is Dying - And that's a bad thing | 2kliksphilipwww.youtube.comProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square146fedilinkcross-posted to: jxlvideos@lemmy.worldtechnology@hexbear.netjpegxl@lemmy.worldtecnologia@feddit.cltechnology@beehaw.org
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·4 months agoYou’re thinking in terms of the individual user with a handful of files. When you look at it from a server point of view with tens of terabytes of images, or as a data center, the picture is very different. Shaving 5 or 10% off of files is a huge deal. And that’s not even taking into account the huge leap in quality.
minus-squareAdrianTheFrog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-24 months agojpeg xl lossless is around 50% smaller than pngs on average, which is a huge difference https://siipo.la/blog/whats-the-best-lossless-image-format-comparing-png-webp-avif-and-jpeg-xl
You’re thinking in terms of the individual user with a handful of files.
When you look at it from a server point of view with tens of terabytes of images, or as a data center, the picture is very different.
Shaving 5 or 10% off of files is a huge deal. And that’s not even taking into account the huge leap in quality.
jpeg xl lossless is around 50% smaller than pngs on average, which is a huge difference
https://siipo.la/blog/whats-the-best-lossless-image-format-comparing-png-webp-avif-and-jpeg-xl