• 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I enjoy that pollsters are starting to poll for what happens if Trump drops and Vance is the top of the ticket, while Washington republicans are trying to figure out how to oust Janky Douche.

    At this point I wouldn’t be completely surprised if that chair that Clint Eastwood shouted at a few years ends up on the ballot.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        2 months ago

        What’s delightful is that their whole… (waves hands frantically) thing1, takes all the most crucial tools off the table. Imagine this safety sign posted at the RNC:

        Absolutely NO:

        • compromising
        • back-tracking
        • changing your mind
        • making mistakes
        • wrong opinions


        All one can do from there is lie while doing one of those things anyway. At a certain point people are going to take notice, which just makes it worse.

        1 - Machismo? Rampant authoritarianism? Sociopathic narcissism? I can’t keep up.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          1 - Machismo? Rampant authoritarianism? Sociopathic narcissism? I can’t keep up.

          Yes.

    • EnderWiggin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 months ago

      At this point I wouldn’t be completely surprised if that chair that Clint Eastwood shouted at a few years ends up on the ballot.

      That was 12 years ago :(

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          honestly, with the rate at which the gop has gone balls to the wall deranged it feels more like 50 years.

          think about it: the reason talking to a chair became a meme was because it was so unbelievable. the reason vance fucking a couch became a meme is because it’s so believable.

    • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      People told me that it was impossible for the Republican party to even concieve of replacing Trump. Yeah? How’s that going now, huh? Personally, I’m looking forward to Trump ripping the party in half.

      • Clasm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s the problem when you have a bunch of narcissistic opportunities vying for power. Eventually, they start trying to push each other down the stairs…

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          And if we found the right lever to push them into destroying each other, we’d have a very effective way to fight fascism.

      • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s where you’re wrong. The chair would actually have fewer felony convictions and rapes. Allegedly. I don’t know that chair personally. But the point is that “fewer” is the grammatically correct word for the point you’re making.

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          “Less” is going to become grammatically correct as it’s used more and more. It’s only a matter of time. There is no useful distinction between the two terms.

          • Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Very late to the comment, but I don’t think and don’t hope this is correct. There is a distinction - fewer is for things you can count, less is for a more abstract, less countable amount. I have fewer opportunities as I have less time. I’m just an old English major, but I like accuracy with language.

            • samus12345@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Yes, there is a difference, but as far as understanding what a person is saying, you can use them interchangeably. In what situation would you need to know whether it’s a countable or abstract amount?

              • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 months ago

                Problems. “I have fewer problems than I did last year” means that I understand what my problems are or am tracking some of them and no longer have as many. “I have less problems than I did last year” is more vibes based and is a statement that this year seems to be going easier than last year went