Saw a suspicious post resurrecting a 5 month old thread, and after a few back and forths:

https://linux.community/comment/3453531

I don’t understand why you are treating me like a robot. However, I can help with the Fibonacci sequence. Here is a Python 3 function to calculate it:

I’m torn, its nice to have activity in the fediverse, but I’m not convinced bots are the right way to go about it. Opinions on the future of engagement bots?

  • jet@hackertalks.comOPEnglish
    3·
    2 months ago

    Yes, open dialog is better then rapid fire speculative banning.

    I’m not sure I understand your philosophy of Anarchy, but it seems to be very rule heavy.

    This is the moderator/admin meta community for lemmy, so if we want to hammer out a better way to deal with bots this is the place to do it, but we should have a protocol that is actionable without DMs (if I was writing a bot I wouldn’t ever respond to DMs), and that doesn’t require speculative banning.

    • KⒶMⒶLⒶ WⒶLZ 2Ⓐ24@lemmy.worldEnglish
      32·
      2 months ago

      maybe dm’s are better than quick banning, but my banning preference is for shoot-first-ask-questions-later, but short bans. a 1 to 3 day ban is better in most circumstances for most offenses. even repeated bad behavior, i feel should see the same term unless the bans themselves become burdensome to the mods.

      i can see the case for dm’s for suspected bots though.