return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 months agoStarbucks is reeling as customers go elsewhere, sales declinewww.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square198fedilinkarrow-up1531arrow-down113cross-posted to: economics@lemmy.world
arrow-up1518arrow-down1external-linkStarbucks is reeling as customers go elsewhere, sales declinewww.nbcnews.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square198fedilinkcross-posted to: economics@lemmy.world
minus-squareStupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up42arrow-down1·2 months agoOnly down 3%? I was hoping more. Still, fuck em. Maybe fewer consumers want to pay out the nose for a cup of flavored sugar with coffee?
minus-squareours@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·edit-22 months agoOverpriced cafeinated milkshakes for adults makerating masquerading as “coffee”.
minus-squareThebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·2 months agoStarbucks customer: Ooof, don’t talk to me before I’ve had my morning coffee…Id like a Venti vanilla caramel mochaccino with 2 extra pumps of vanilla and double drizzle on the whipped cream…but low fat whipped cream
minus-squareMasterbaexunn@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoLow fat tho. Cause I don’t wanna get fat lol
minus-squareours@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoRemember kids: fat bad, sugar good. This message was financed by the fine people of the snack and fast food industry.
minus-squareKrauerking@lemy.lollinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months ago makerating Masquerading? It’s an honestly difficult borrowed French/Italian word just checking if that’s what you were going for.
minus-squareours@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoYep, you’re correct, I butchered it. Tired.
minus-squarerekorse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoFire your auto correct, that shit let you down hard.
minus-squareCileTheSane@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 months agoWhen you demand infinite growth any decline in growth is a catastrophe.
minus-squarerekorse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-22 months agoThey really should post their expected goals along side the loss. For example they could have a goal of 3% increase which means they undershot their goal by a stupid margin.
Only down 3%? I was hoping more. Still, fuck em. Maybe fewer consumers want to pay out the nose for a cup of flavored sugar with coffee?
Overpriced cafeinated milkshakes for adults
makeratingmasquerading as “coffee”.Starbucks customer: Ooof, don’t talk to me before I’ve had my morning coffee…Id like a Venti vanilla caramel mochaccino with 2 extra pumps of vanilla and double drizzle on the whipped cream…but low fat whipped cream
Low fat tho. Cause I don’t wanna get fat lol
Remember kids: fat bad, sugar good.
This message was financed by the fine people of the snack and fast food industry.
Oatmilk!
Masquerading?
It’s an honestly difficult borrowed French/Italian word just checking if that’s what you were going for.
Yep, you’re correct, I butchered it. Tired.
Fire your auto correct, that shit let you down hard.
When you demand infinite growth any decline in growth is a catastrophe.
They really should post their expected goals along side the loss.
For example they could have a goal of 3% increase which means they undershot their goal by a stupid margin.