Hello World, As many of you have probably noticed, there is a growing problem on the internet when it comes to undisclosed bias in both amateur and professional reporting. While not every outlet can be like the C-SPAN, or Reuters, we also believe that it’s impossible to remove the human element from the news, especially when it concerns, well, humans.

To this end, we’ve created a media bias bot, which we hope will keep everyone informed about WHO, not just the WHAT of posted articles. This bot uses Media Bias/Fact Check to add a simple reply to show bias. We feel this is especially important with the US Election coming up. The bot will also provide links to Ground.News, as well, which we feel is a great source to determine the WHOLE coverage of a given article and/or topic.

As always feedback is welcome, as this is a active project which we really hope will benefit the community.

Thanks!

FHF / LemmyWorld Admin team 💖

  • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    While I’m not as concerned with MBFC as many others are, why not use Wikipedia’s RSP as the datasource? Made by the most reliable user-generated platform in the world, it’s a great list of controversial sources and is completely open. Changes are also infrequent enough so that adding to the database by hand would be quite easy.

    I also echo the concerns raised below on the uselessness at a glance due to the accordion hiding the only information and purpose the bot was created to serve.

    • zephyreks
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because the mods on this community would rather choose a source that they agree with than a source that’s reliable.