Welcome to version v1.109.0 of Immich. This release introduces an additional way for you to support Immich financially as well as bug fixes for various issues. Some of the highlights in this release include:

Immich license pricing is $25 per user or $99 per server for a lifetime license.

  • ShortN0te
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yep and eventually there will be a paid proprietary version. That’s usually how it goes. I hope I am wrong.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      They promised at least that’s not how they’re going to do this, at least. But in the end, it’s easy to backpaddle on these promises.

      Still: you can always fork the project.

      • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t think it’s possible to make this project proprietary because FUTO does not own the rights to the code that were made by random contributors on git. Part of the promise was that they won’t change their CLA so it should be fine.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        They would need to do a private rewrite. Once again this is why you should never sign any kind of CLA. There isn’t a CLA here but it there were it would be a simple matter of them changing the license.

      • ShortN0te
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        While true it is not impossible to relicense a software project.

        • traches@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          They would have to track down everyone who has ever contributed to the project and convince them to sign a CLA. Many/most would refuse, whose code they would have to rewrite from scratch without violating their copyright (meaning no copy-pasting).

          It would be messy and extremely painful, and at the end of the process we’d still have Immich as it was before the license change available to fork and maintain ourselves.

          • ShortN0te
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            They only need the biggest contributors. Small contributions like single line or even a few lines edits etc. are not eligible for copyright. Also minor contributions can be easily rewritten.

            Most ppl you will get with a paycheck.

            • traches@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              … at which point we could still fork the project from before the license change and continue on our merry way.

              If you expect ongoing maintenance, are you saying you feel entitled to the devs’ continuing work in perpetuity, and at no cost? Because that’s called slavery and we have laws against it.

              • ShortN0te
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                If you expect ongoing maintenance, are you saying you feel entitled to the devs’ continuing work in perpetuity, and at no cost? Because that’s called slavery and we have laws against it.

                Stop putting words in my mouth.

                • traches@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  I’m just trying to understand what you’re upset about. Immich is released under one of the most user-protecting licenses out there, without a CLA, and every communication from everyone on the dev team has emphatically committed to keeping it that way. You’re over here saying “yeah but they might change it some day” and sure, maybe, but it would be a gigantic pain in the ass, there’s no indication they plan to do so, and you could say the same thing about literally any other open source project. And even if they did change it, we’d still have the most recent GPL version to fork! What more could you possibly want? All that’s left is a guarantee of ongoing maintenance, which I’m sorry but you are not entitled to that.

                  Edit: and the best way to ensure ongoing maintenance is to fund the project. Devs gotta eat.