I watch a fair amount of series, but I’m not a data hoarder. I see the value in 2GB episodes, but I watch most series on my laptop, my simple 1920x1080 tv or even my phone where that value doesn’t make a difference. If I want to have a theater experience, I’ll go to the theater.

Most of the times I just want to enjoy a good story and relax before I go to bed.

I don’t have infinite storage and I hate when I want to download something new, but Im out of storage, so I have to delete stuff first.

  • ֆᎮ⊰◜◟⋎◞◝⊱ֆᎮ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good enough for who? You? Sure. But not everyone watches on a small screen. Some people might actually care about the quality too. Some of us can’t goto the theatre.

    2GB isn’t large by any stretch. There are 720p versions of pretty much everything (at least that’s what I see on most Usenet Indexers). You could easily get a multiple terabyte external drive if your internal storage is full.

    • ayaya@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah complaining about storage space in 2023 is a bit silly. You can go on eBay right now and get a used 4TB SATA drive for $25. Even cheaper if you get SAS drives, you just need a SAS expansion card which is also around $20 or so. 6TB SAS drives are going for $30.

      ISP data caps are a bigger enemy than raw storage capacity these days. It costs me $50/mo to remove my 1TB cap. Which means it is more expensive to download 6TB than it is to buy 6TB of physical storage. And even SSDs are dirt cheap now. Storage has never been cheaper.

        • ayaya@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I am using unRAID so if one dies I can just replace it. About 4 years ago I bought a lot of fifteen 3TB SAS drives and I have had them running 24/7 since then. Funny enough not a single one has died. They all had around 5 years of power-on hours and now they are up to 9 and still going strong. Honestly I expected to lose at least one per year but they are surprisingly resilient.

      • Retiring
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t know data caps are still a thing. Where is this?

        • ayaya@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The good ol’ United States. Most of the major ISPs have caps here and you do not really have multiple choices because they basically have monopolies in their respective areas.

          • Retiring
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I did not know that! I remember data caps being a thing here in the middle of Europe in the early 2000s. There haven’t been data caps for home internet connections for a long time.

    • Chev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      A family of 4 going to the theater is about 1TB of external SSD. Nowadays they are smaller than your regular phone.

    • iopq@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe try watching a 1080p HEVC or AV1 episode, 200MB for half an hour or 400MB for an hour and it looks amazing

    • Billy_Gnosis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d even say that going to the theater sucks balls. The picture and sound quality usually sucks compared to a high quality download on a 75" 4k TV. Even a high bit rate 1080p video looks better than the theater.

  • Briongloid@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    500mb 1080p HEVC for most shows on a 75" TV, but if it’s a space sci-fi show with lots of dark scenes I need that 1GB-2GB episode.

    Some shows get by on 200MB, but it depends how static the scenes are and how much lighting there is.

    • yoichi@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Surely at that size you would notice the artifacts. Just for my sake can you try a Bluray remux. I expect it’s 4k so you could just grab a 4k web-DL and see if you can notice the difference.

  • Chahk@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I paid for this 4k TV, so damn it I want all the pixels!

    Seriously though, resolution is only half the equation. Bitrate, HDR, and compression methods are very important as well.

  • richyawyingtmv
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not on my 65" 8k OLED they aren’t! You can absolutely tell the difference.

    Smaller/low res screens though, sure.

    • sharpiemarker@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what I’m saying; not everyone watches media on their phones. I have a Plex server at home with a projector and a mediocre 5.1 (not a HTIB). No way I’m running anything less than 1080p.

      • richyawyingtmv
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ha, yeah. I work from home, and when I’m out the last thing I want to do is look at my phone.

        So I watch films at home. I paid for a high end home cinema set up, I’m gonna make the most of it. Otherwise it’s just a waste.

        This may change as I’m having to downscale a bit for my new apartment…but yeah, 200mb still won’t be enough.

  • haych@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, 300-350MB h265 is great for anime. The 1GB+ are fine and all, but I’d rather save storage space.

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anime encoders squeeze the most out of the h265 codec… Its astounding how they achieve great quality video for the filesize, even in scenes with fast motion or odd vignettes/filters

      • ayaya@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Even the highest quality anime isn’t very complex compared to any live-action footage so it compresses incredibly well. The better groups also use vapoursynth filters to fix errors on the blu-rays like bad anti-aliasing and banding. So the best encodes will actually look better than a remux which is never going to happen with live-action.

  • SmokeFree
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    As long as you are happy with that, all good. Fuck the people that sets a standard for you.

  • BitterSweet@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    The rise of HEVC and AV1 is arriving! Keeping the quality with a smaller file size. Plex and most android devices support AV1 now too!

  • arcrust@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Your best bet would be to use handbrake and transcode them down yourself. I have a relatively. I’ve setup for my living room and thus want to get the best quality I can. Exact opposite reasons to you but, It’s easy to downgrade, basically impossible to upgrade.

    But that’s my two cents. Ideally, every file is uploaded with both of us in mind.

    • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was just going to say, handbrake is a good way to cut back a bit on file size if you get the settings right. It is very taxing on hardware tho.

  • DanglingFury@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I sort by size, then seeders. I didn’t buy all my hifi tv and surround sound to watch compression in action. I couldn’t imagine those 200 to 300 mb episodes, but to each their own. i usually pull the 3 gb to 4 gb episodes.

    A 12tb WD hard drive is like 200$ when they go on sale. That equates to about 0.015$/gb. So that 3 gb show costs all of a nickel to store.

  • fiah@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    my laptop, my simple 1920x1080 tv or even my phone

    yeah well that’s cool but I like my media big and (when appropriate) loud, with as high a quality as I can get

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    1337x has tons of episodes that are that size. It seems to either be ~200mb or 2gb+ though. It would be cool if there were a nice middle ground.

  • omgnvq@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    You could transcode your downloads and store them at a lower quality if you want to save space. It is extra steps though.

  • veloute@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    absolutely agree. for most shows, I don’t particularly care what I download, but for specific shows like GoT, I’ll go for the high quality x264 copy

    • seaturtle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      • Saving files for offline enjoyment/no dependence on internet connection.
      • More player and playback options: easier rewind/fast-forward, chapter controls (for many releases), etc.
      • Fewer ads/pop-ups/phishing/etc. nonsense (depending on how effective your browser’s adblockers are)
      • Often, choice of subs and dubs. Generally better ones than the generic DVD release subs. And sometimes, even commentary tracks.
      • Dalë@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bearing in mind the community you’re posting in I wouldn’t think they were suggesting the big streaming companies.

        Kodi + (insertname)debrid or stremio+ (insertname)debrid … either will let you stream torrents in much better quality than the streaming sites and no need to horde.

        Also, i’m fairly sure there’s some torrent clients that allow streaming of the torrent file, I’m not sure if they’re still around but I think Vuze was one, I don’t used desktops any more just mobile/tablet so my knowledge might now be out of date.

    • matey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I actually prefer the Jellyfin interface even when I have access to content through another service.