I would never criticise someone’s distro. As long as it was arch built without any scripts.
This pleb didn’t even write his own kernel.
If you don’t use Linux From Scratch, why do you even bother?
I actually want to try a LFS install, mostly to gain a deeper understanding of how Linux works. To anyone who’s done an LFS install: good idea or waste of time?
Learning things is always a great idea if you have time and interest.
deleted by creator
I’d rather be waterboarded
Deal!
Just did that for the first time today and the second, third and ,fourth time aswell
Distros are like Kinks. I have my own and you have yours, I won’t judge.
Except for Manjaro with their expired certs and DDoSing AUR. Or niche remixes that don’t patch stuff and don’t have a warning saying that our stuff is old, don’t use it if you care about that.
Best Linux analogy I’ve read in a long time.
they are just waiting for you to discover Arch ;)
Arch is the cross-fit of the Linux world.
This is the best analogy I’ve seen for Arch.
Please explain
How do you know if someone does CrossFit?
Haha, now I feel dumb needing the joke explained to me
Or vegans etc etc
Ahh yes, Good Guy Greg. Just like the good old days, I’m loving the nostalgia of these vintage memes.
bro in a world of scumbag steves it feels good to see a ggg
deleted by creator
Yeah, Lemmy right now reminds me a bit of that era of the internet. It’s strangley nostalgic.
I was about to post the same. Good guy Greg was cool.
I know enough about Linux to be able to install most distros and use them, but I don’t know enough about them to criticizes others for their choice.
I will, however, warn them about Manjaro, fuck it.
I’ve seen many comments about Manjaro, what’s the deal with it? I used it shortly a few years ago but I didn’t liked it
My wife and I haven’t had any issues with it, they’re just easy to paint as the bad distro because it’s supposed to uncomplicate Arch for your average user, but has had some certs fall through the cracks and they had kind of an asshole response to address it (thank God Gnome and Linux devs are never contentious folks), and apparently people don’t read the warnings about enabling AUR in the package manager. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not the perfect distro, but it doesn’t deserve nearly as much hate as it gets. It’s not Canonical, pushing Amazon and telemetry by default 😆 besides, it’s got some cool features out of the box like one of the better default dualboot grubs I’ve seen by default, the ability to have multiple kernels installed simultaneously from multiple streams, and while it’s common anymore, was one of the early adopters of providing Nvidia drivers on install. Lots of people have strong opinions on what distro is best, and Manjaro manages to be an easy one to point fingers at.
There are legitimate criticisms of Manjaro, and these days there are better options like Archinstall or EndeavorOS, but yeah it’s mostly just become a popular distro to shit on.
Canonical deserves way more hate than the Manjaro devs tbh.
Oh for real, I won’t deny there’s legit plenty to call them out on, and as well we should, but I was always baffled that they just how much they get, especially compared to Canonical.
Manjaro piggybacks off of Arch and some Arch users want to be obnoxious about it.
There’s nothing wrong with the distro, itself.
The maintainers have done some inconsequential noob-ish things with the site’s website, and the in-house package manager (pamac) had a bug that took down the AUR once and Arch users that couldn’t host their own website if they wanted to like to point fingers and troll.
deleted by creator
What’s wrong with manjaro?
Mostly the admins. They’ve forgotten to renew their SSL certs multiple times, causing various issues, and they introduced a bug that briefly DDOSed the entire AUR.
The distro itself seems fine. Although, I don’t see why you wouldn’t just use Arch with Archinstall or EndeavorOS if you really want that GUI installer. Both are much better managed imo.
Both arch and endeavor OS don’t have the gui pacman interface they are terminal based distro. Manhor makes it easy to use without even opening up the terminal to do anything. Most people and new user are not too comfortable with using the terminal. So the gui helps to make things simple.
Both arch and endeavor OS don’t have the gui pacman interface they are terminal based distro. Manhor makes it easy to use without even opening up the terminal to do anything. Most people and new user are not too comfortable with using the terminal. So the gui helps to make things simple.
This is often linked. It’s basically just bad management, bad tools and much worse it is holding back security updates.
deleted by creator
I use Arch btw.
How do you know when someone is a
veganArch user?Iusearchlinux.fyi
There’s HUNDREDS of us! HUNDREDS!
Just read the news feed, folks
I thought Lemmy was another excuse to never do research on my own. Please explain so I don’t have to leave Lemmy
It’s usually recommended to read the Arch news before doing an update because if there are any known issues they will be reported there. However, I’ve been using Arch now for a few years and I’ve never encountered any issues during updates (I know that others have not been so lucky. There was an update that caused grub to break for many that I recall, but I wasn’t affected by it.)
Ah lol totally missed what you meant. Yeah I used Arch since 2010, so I went through the big ones like switching to systemd, moving to
/usr/bin, etc.Never had any issues that couldn’t be easily repaired from an archiso, and you learn from them every time!
Also there are tools to warn you when updating after a news article has been posted, but I enjoy living on the edge.
Ah lol totally missed what you meant.
Oh, I wasn’t the person you were originally responding to. Just someone that came by later and had an answer to what I thought the question was you were asking.
Everytime I mention Linux in the outside world, people’s brains freeze and then I get questions. I need a better social circle.
I swear that when I was a student, my department had a good mix of distros.
- Most students were on Ubuntu and Mint VMs.
- Students in system or HPC labs had to learn CentOS. However, my entry condition to my lab was to install FreeBSD as a guest on VMWare ESXi. Everything must be specifically partitioned and must be done in one sitting. (This happened illegally in the server room. I could not exit and hope to reenter, hence the rule.)
- Enthusiasts learn Debian.
- I don’t know what happened to SlackWare people.
Kids these days? WSL or Mac.
To be fair, installing MacOS on a PC is harder than most Linux distros.
To be fair, installing MacOS on a PC is harder than most Linux distros.
MacOS on an FX-8350 (pre-OpenCore), with nvidia graphics was legitimately one of the most difficult and unpleasant projects I have ever undertaken in all my years of stupid projects, worse than the time I managed to fuck up fstab so badly I turned 6 drives into 6,000+ drives.
Is Slackware even still around?
I’m in the WSL camp at home, and Red Hat at work
Yes, it’s being mantained pretty actively
Slackware 15 came out like late last year/early this year. I want to try it tbh (religious reasons), only really used Fedora so far.
Amogos is the best just saying🙄
sus
AmongOS is dead 😭😭😭
Arch linux is the gateway drug that leads to NixOS
How is Nixos? Are there clear advantages over a traditional Linux distro?
Nix hype has been high the last several months for some reason despite it being around for awhile. I think DevOps guys are just now discovering it or something.
Disclosure: I haven’t used it. I’ve just watched a few videos and have been following the hype. Someone correct me if I’m wrong.
My understanding is that it is similar to the idempotency that Terraform brings but on a OS, packages and code level.
Basically you define (in a file) everything you want on the OS from packages to settings to custom repos and it installs everything so even if something goes sideways and say your server gets hacked, you just start over not from scratch or hopefully a clean fallback image but with everything you need installed out of the gate on a fresh install.
Can also be super useful for ensuring your whole team is using the same setup. No more reading a manual for this one obscure firewall that some random guy setup. Your firewall (or whatever else) was installed and configured out of the box, plus it is the same org wide.
With flakes, you can also lock the project or your system to an exact commit of the nixpkgs repo, meaning you get the same versions until you update the lock file. It’s like a npm or cargo lock file, but for the whole system.
The nix packages define how to build and configure it, so the build part is like Gentoo. It has a powerful cache setup, so you rarely need to really build anything. Need a custom kernel though? Define your patches in your config and it works exactly the same until you update it.
Learn a dynamic lazy functional programming language first and then start building a flake without much help or documentation because that’s what you should be doing and the default installation doesn’t use that mechanism. The docs you find will assume you understand category theory already.
About few years later you are a god and there is no way you’re going to use anything else ever again.
Source: been a user for the past four years.
I understood maybe three things in your reply so NixOS probably not for me.
He didn’t explain it well. The whole system lives on a ymal file and is easy to read. Documentation as code. If you have a working system then you’re set, it’ll never break. Adding software uses it’s own dependencies and will never break other software. It also has roll back features like snapshot/btrfs, during bootup you can go back to a previous version of your system. With the ymal file it makes it easy to clone the setup from others or for other systems of yours in the future, just have to generate a hardware file in most cases.
Yeah, that’s what I wanted to communicate! But, there is a spot for this OS: you’ve been a programmer for decades now, you still love Linux and you’ve customized every piece of your desktop and programming environment. Now, NixOS gives you the possibility to write one config to configure everything: from your system daemons to the desktop wallpaper, from the editor theme to the kernel boot parameters. And when you store a lock file, the same configuration that worked correctly in one machine, will work exactly the same in another computer.
So, you have a workstation, maybe another workstation in the office and a laptop? You change something in your setup, and this setup gets replicated exactly the same in every other machine when you push your changes to the version control. This is very nice, especially if you have a highly customized emacs, vim or helix as your editor, and like to try out new tools outside of coretools for the CLI lyfe.
Another thing, where you don’t even need NixOS (just the nix package manager installed in your Linux, Mac or Windows machine), is how you can configure your project dependencies with it. Now, you run a business that develops software with maybe Rust and TypeScript, or Go and Javascript. You need a special version of OpenSSL or a certain version of Rust. The project then has the nix flake in it, and nix-direnv. The devs enter the directory and nix installs every single tool needed for the project correctly for everybody. The same version, the same config, everything streamlined for the whole team. If the env works correctly for one dev, it works for everybody.
I hope this answers why you’d like to put some effort to learn it. It’s hard in the beginning, but there’s a huge payback for certain use cases.
How ya liking it?
I replied in another comment about some of it’s features. I love it, its really hard to break even compared to my previous Arch install using auto snapshots on btrfs.
i’m about to take my first peek into linux on mint. i’m not completely put off learning some new things but being able to do that in a desktop that is familar makes everything a lot easier to pick up on. who knows, if it all goes smoothly maybe next week i’ll be running arch (i won’t)
Mint is honestly the best one to go for really especially since everything just works there almost.
just works “almost” is pretty funny but i know what you mean. i wasn’t having much trouble with it testing it with a virtual machine. the nice thing is a lot of the applications i use on windows are already free software that im realizing are a lot of the go to’s for people running linux, so really a lot should “just work”
I’ve been using Linux on and off for ~15 years and I run Mint on my main desktop PC just because it’s so intuitive and stable. I want my gaming PC to “just work” and not need any tweaking, so Mint is perfect.
Yeah, was my first that didn’t crash during install, really enjoyed it
If you want a EAVEN more windows like distro I will recomend nobara. The official version is a windows 7 styled gnome and it is based on fedora.
i havent really looked into that, been mostly researching debian based distros specifically ubuntu and it’s bunch since a lot of recommendations go to it. nobara looks interesting for the big gaming spin it has though i’m still iffy on being at home with linux for games, but from the outside looking in things like proton seem to be doing a lot of good in that space recently.
I started with Mint and then moved on. Honestly I think Debian based ones are not nearly as good as Redhat or Arch based. You can get easy to use versions such as Fedora or Manjaro without being a headache at all, and their systems are superior to PPAs (which in itself is far superior to windows updating). Obviously my opinion is not the end all, but I highly recommend branching out a bit and trying things with the different base systems. I thought Debian was the bees knees, then tried the others and really haven’t looked back.
Using Mint right now, started off with Kubuntu but decided to stick with the Gnome desktop environment for a bit, at least until KDE works out some of its kinks lol. I will say, KDE worked better with my drawing tablet than Gnome so…
Getting the damn thing to install was a total nightmare for me .
The instructions on their site had nothing step by step, -still no idea how to work checksums- so I had to figure out how to get an ISO onto a flash drive (turns out it needs additional software), how to get it onto the hdd without bios access (thanks Windows 10), then fight through tpm errors.
Hell, even having to torrent the file in the first place was a pain since the machine I was installing on didn’t want to download the ISO.
Took me all morning, but could’ve been worse in my mental fog, I guess
Arch is easy enough to install. If you ever get tired of overhead, ala all the apps on the OS which you never use, just start from scratch. It’s not hard to install the base, desktop envo + a browser and start from there. The cleanest desktop you can imagine and probably the resulting OS too
arch is interesting to me and i’m not too worried about the install, the rolling releases and stability of the system are what i think would snag me in using it. though the minute regular updates are probably more an issue for people who delve into the system more to get the absolute most out of it. it’ll be more stable, works out of the box-type distros for me while i get a grasp of things like the file system and using the terminal. but i do think the setups people post of their riced out installs look pretty cool ngl
It is a common misconception that rolling release distros are inherently less stable than other distros. My experience has been exactly the opposite. I’ve used, for extended periods, Ubuntu, Manjaro and Arch. Both Manjaro and Arch were far more stable than my experience with Ubuntu. With ubuntu, every time I had to do a full system upgrade it was a crapshoot about whether or not I would be spending the next day or two fixing my system. But with Manjaro and Arch, it’s never a full system upgrade, as long as you are doing updates regularly, they tend to remain small and manageable.
I’ve never had an update brick my system on Arch and have never felt the need to restart from scratch because an update went to shit. But that was an experience I was getting used to on Ubuntu.
Disclaimer, this is just my experience, and your own mileage may vary.
The rolling release being unstable is wrong. You don’t get the “dev” version of update with bugs and instability, you get a proper update, just in small increments usually. A lot of people who actually run arch will tell you the same, sometimes it’s even more stable than the major release type systems.
I used mint for a long time, the only reason I switched is that my Nvidia card was preventing mint to boot/install on my new laptop. I didn’t want to spent hours on it tried a few distros until one worked (Manjaro). I like Manjaro now, but might have to try mint again (laptop is a few years old so it will probably work now).
I use Hannah Montana Linux btw
deleted by creator
Bro, I spent so many hours a few years ago getting a hannah montana stick up to date so I could prank a co-worker… I was second shift and watched the first shifters roll in. I know this is a joke but man I learned a lot that night.
Best of both worlds
I don’t criticize, I just give fair warnings. I want people to enjoy Linux like I do, not call me every other week because something is “broken”
First time installing Linux? What the fuck is this Ubuntu shit, that distro sucks. You really should try out Gentoo as your first distro.
Can’t believe I fell for that as a kid. Wasn’t even my first distro, but Gentoo for beginners is just hilarious
Gentoo is the final boss of Linux installs. (Linux From Scratch is the raid boss)
I installed it last year. After watching it compile for half an hour, I decided that a source-based distro was something I have no interest in daily-driving.
deleted by creator
I think someday I’ll do a gauntlet of Linux installs back to back. Start easy: Ubuntu - Debian - Arch - Nixos - Gentoo - LFS. Not sure if I put Nixos right though. Tbf I’ve already done Debian so maybe I’ll start with Arch.
deleted by creator
