The shooter was 12 when Trump was first elected. archive

  • adj16@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Because it’s potentially indicative of a national database of everyone’s DNA, rather than just the criminal database, which would be (and perhaps is) a privacy nightmare

    • reddithalation@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      some large commercial dna testing companies share their databases with law enforcement, and additionally you really don’t need a close match to start identifying someone, 5th cousin type thing etc. heres an good video on the issue.

    • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not. Law enforcement can get a warrant on 23 & Me. Everyone turning over the DNA to random companies not required to comply with HIPAA is a terrible idea.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Some states have been collecting blood for almost 40 years and can’t even really say why. They just started doing it…

      https://www.ibj.com/articles/58596-storing-babies-blood-samples-pits-privacy-versus-science

      Like, they have an excuse for taking the samples that seems valid. Except I don’t think they’re actually testing them. And there’s no reason to keep after testing.

      Now, I dont think it’s for a secret DNA database, I think it’s normal red state bullshit.

      Just pointing out in some states the take and keep blood samples from every birth