• greysemanticist@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I thought the movie was more nuanced than that—the “smart parents” of Idiocracy did not have smart children—they had zero children. The smart couple in fact were the ones doing “self-eugenics” to their own detriment.

    Eugenics or not, evolution favors the population that produces the fittest offspring for the environment–not the smartest.

    • lorty
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      So the movie isn’t eugenic because it showed people doing eugenics wrong?

      • greysemanticist@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s more “tragedy of the commons” eugenics than “evil corporate-governmental-white supremacy” eugenics.

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          So the movie isn’t prophetic, and people constantly harping about how it’s coming true are fucking morons?

          • greysemanticist@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            The majority of comedy works because there is truth in it. Sure, Idiocracy is prophetic, or we wouldn’t be discussing it today. Nobody discusses South Park’s “Bigger Longer Uncut” like Idiocracy because it doesn’t really engage this kind of truth.

            What I cannot tell is if people have always been this moronic and we’re only more aware of it because of ubiquitous cell phone camera technology and the Internet’s capability to rapidly distribute awareness of dumbness that would have otherwise stayed regionally isolated.

            “Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.”—George Carlin