I’m talking about this sort of thing. Like clearly I wouldn’t want someone to see that on my phone in the office or when I’m sat on a bus.

However there seems be a lot of these that aren’t filtered out by nsfw settings, when a similar picture of a woman would be, so it seems this is a deliberate feature I might not be understanding.

Discuss.

  • nutomicA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    There is no need for any “green light”, if there was a problem with the rfc we would have said so from the beginning. From what I can tell the rfc is not completed yet, and when it’s completed someone still needs to step up to implement it. Even my own rfc which was finished months ago is still not merged and not implemented.

      • nutomicA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well someone has to write the code.

        • Ludrol@szmer.info
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I know someone that is willing to implement this feature, but they are waiting for merge of rfc to open a Pull Request with initial implementation.

          As I understand the RFCs are for defining scope and design requirements for specific feature. And when the design is finalised RFC is merged. Then someone opens a PR to implement it.

          If you were imagining some other process it would be beneficial to acknowledge change of development phase from designing to implementing.

          P.S. The readme in the repo is supporting my view.