I’m talking about this sort of thing. Like clearly I wouldn’t want someone to see that on my phone in the office or when I’m sat on a bus.

However there seems be a lot of these that aren’t filtered out by nsfw settings, when a similar picture of a woman would be, so it seems this is a deliberate feature I might not be understanding.

Discuss.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Which half?

    NSFW is not safe for work, so if it wouldn’t fly at work… it should be marked.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Clearly we have a different understanding, how do you apply Not Safe For Work?

        • Ephera
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ve often seen NSFW used as basically just “contains nudity”. You could have a woman in skimpy clothing shaking her everything in a manner clearly trying to evoke sexual thoughts, but because her nipples and genitalia are technically covered, it would get posted as “SFW”.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            4 months ago

            Sure, so you want a nudity/sex tag instead of a NSFW tag.

            NSFW would be a superset of nudity.

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Just because some people don’t know how to use NSFW doesn’t mean it means something else than “Not suited for work”. Anything that a colleague, boss etc could see that would result in awkwardness, “the talk”, is NSFW. Same thing for gore.